农村宅基地利用与管理改革政策本体评价研究——以我国14个首批试点地区为样本  

Evaluation of the Policy Ontology of Rural Residential Land Utilization and Management Reform:Taking the First 14 Pilot Areas as Samples

作　　者：宋敏[1] 杨紫雯 胡银根 SONG Min;YANG Zi-wen;HU Yin-gen(College of Business Administration,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China;College of Public Administration,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430073,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学工商管理学院,湖北武汉430073 [2]华中农业大学公共管理学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《经济体制改革》2021年第3期86-93,共8页Reform of Economic System

基　　金：国家自然科学基金面上项目“宅基地有偿退出与有偿使用策略对农户决策行为的影响机理、响应阈值与政策优化”(41671173);农业农村部管理干部学院课题“村宅基地管理与利用政策评价指标和评价标准建设”(32519108024);中南财经政法大学研创课题“试点地区农村宅基地管理与利用政策研究”(202010830)。

摘　　要：对实施宅基地利用与管理改革的首批14个试点地区进行政策本体评价,研究表明,14个地区政策总得分差异明显且多处于中间水平;试点政策在"宅基地权益取得与保障"评价维度的探索最为丰富,其次为"宅基地改革管理制度"维度;各地对各维度政策的完备性、适宜性、弹性等均有涉及,但表现各异。鉴于此,应正确处理宅基地保障性与财产性功能的关系,继续丰富其有偿使用和退出的政策内容,完善各项管理制度及监管体系。This paper evaluates the policy ontology of the first 14 pilot areas which implemented the reform of homestead utilization and management.The results show that:The total score of each pilot area is obviously different,and most of them are in the middle level.The pilot policy has the richest exploration in the evaluation dimension of acquisition and protection of homestead rights and interests,followed by the dimension of homestead reform management system.Pilot areas consider the completeness,suitability,and flexibility of policies in each policy dimensions,but the performance of policy exploration is different.Therefore,it is suggested to correctly handle the relationship between the social benefit function and the property function of the rural residential land,continue to enrich the policy content of paid use and paid withdrawal,and perfect the management and supervision systems.

关 键 词：农村宅基地 制度改革 政策本体 试点地区 评价 

分 类 号：F320.3[经济管理—产业经济]