检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王小乔 尹晓盟[2] 刘丹[1] 周艳丽[2] 刘蕊 WANG Xiaoqiao;YIN Xiaomeng;LIU Dan;ZHOU Yanli;LIU Rui(School of Nursing,Dalian Medical University,Liaoning province,116000,China)
机构地区:[1]大连医科大学护理学院,辽宁省116000 [2]大连医科大学附属第一医院心律失常二科
出 处:《中国护理管理》2021年第5期670-673,共4页Chinese Nursing Management
摘 要:目的:对心房颤动知识评估工具(AFKAT)进行汉化及文化调试,并对其进行信度及效度评价。方法:采用翻译并修订后的中文版AFKAT对340名普通公众进行调查,分析中文版AFKAT的信度及效度。结果:中文版AFKAT总Cronbach’s α系数为0.822,探索性因子分析提取4个公因子,累积贡献率为53.256%;验证性因子分析显示,中文版AFKAT的因子模型拟合较好,卡方自由度比值为2.019,比较拟合指数(CFI)为0.909,渐进残差均方和平方根(RMSEA)为0.055。结论:中文版AFKAT保留原量表的21个条目,具有良好的信度及效度,可以作为评估一般人群心房颤动知识水平的可靠工具。Objective:To adapt the Atrial Fibrillation Knowledge Assessment Tool(AFKAT)to China and test its reliability and validity.Methods:Three hundred and forty members of the general public were surveyed with the translated and revised Chinese version of AFKAT,and the reliability and validity of the tool were analyzed.Results:The overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the Chinese version of AFKAT was 0.822.Four common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis,and the cumulative contribution rate was 53.256%.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the factor model of Chinese version of AFKAT fitted the data well(CMIN/DF=2.019,CFI=0.909,RMSEA=0.055).Conclusion:The Chinese version of AFKAT retains 21 items of the original scale and has good reliability and validity.It can be used as a reliable tool to evaluate the knowledge level of atrial fibrillation in the general population.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117