检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李彧 LI Yu(School of Economics,Peking University,Beijing 100871)
机构地区:[1]北京大学经济学院,北京100871
出 处:《价格月刊》2021年第6期79-87,共9页
基 金:教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大课题“APEC问题决策咨询研究”(编号:17JJDGJW007)。
摘 要:近年来,区域贸易协定(FreeTradeAgreement,FTA)数量激增,特别是美国、日本以及欧盟等主要经济体都已将FTA作为其重要的贸易政策工具。FTA战略的发展不仅为各国带来传统的经济利益,而且兼具谋取政治、外交以及国家安全的战略意义。FTA的竞争性自由化使参与国和地区经济进一步密切融合,其对国际经贸规则、地缘利益以及世界经济格局的影响则加剧了相关经济体特别是大国之间的竞争博弈。这些问题已经超越了传统经济学研究框架的分析能力,从而难以对某些现象作出恰当的解释。有鉴于此,从国际政治经济分析的视角对美国、日本、欧盟等世界主要经济体的FTA战略现状以及政治经济考量进行分析,从而对中国FTA的发展提出对策建议。In recent years,the number of free trade agreements(Free Trade Agreement,FTA)has increased sharply.In particular,major economies such as the United States,Japan,and the European Union have adopted FTA as their important trade policy instruments.The development of FTA strategy not only brings traditional economic benefits to countries,but also has the strategic significance of seeking political,diplomatic and security benefits.The competitive liberalization of FTA has made the economies of participating countries and regions more closely integrated,and its impact on international economic rules,geopolitical interests,and the world economic pattern has intensified the competition and game among related economies,especially major countries.These problems have surpassed the analytical capabilities of traditional economic research frameworks,making it difficult to properly explain certain phenomena.In view of this,this paper analyzed the current situation of FTA strategy and political and economic considerations of the world’s major economies such as the United States,Japan,and the European Union from the perspective of international political and economic analysis and put forward countermeasures and suggestions for the development of China’s FTA.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49