检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:景熠[1] 杜鹏琦 曹柳 JING Yi;DU Peng-qi;CAO Liu(College of Management,Chongqing University of Technology,Chongqing400054,China)
出 处:《运筹与管理》2021年第5期110-115,共6页Operations Research and Management Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目:我国重点区域大气污染协同治理模式研究(14BGL100);重庆市人文社会科学研究项目:成渝区域大气污染协同治理的影响机理和动态演化研究(18SKGH096)。
摘 要:“空气流域”内各个地方政府之间的信任程度,是影响大气污染协同治理关系稳定性的关键因素。从地方政府的有限理性出发,构建了三个地方政府参与区域大气污染协同治理的非对称信任演化博弈模型。在求解模型均衡点并分析其稳定性的基础上,探讨了不同情况下的信任演化路径,以及各个参数变化对信任概率的影响。研究表明:提高直接治理效益、协同加成效益、协同间接效益,降低治理风险成本,显化潜在损失,并合理确定生态补偿数额,能够提升协同治理关系最终达到信任均衡状态的可能性。The degree of trust among local governments in the air basin is a key factor affecting the stability of the collaborative governance relationship of air pollution.Based on the bounded rationality of local governments,an asymmetric trust evolutionary game model of three local governments participating in the collaborative governance of regional air pollution is constructed.On the basis of solving the equilibrium point of the model and analyzing its stability,the evolutionary path of trust in different situations and the influence of the variations of each parameter on trust probability are discussed.This research shows that improving the direct governance benefit,collaborative addition benefit,collaborative indirect benefit,reducing governance risk cost,revealing potential loss,and reasonably determining the amount of ecological compensation can enhance the possibility that the collaborative governance relationship ultimately reaches the state of trust equilibrium.
分 类 号:C931[经济管理—管理学] X51[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117