检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗明尧[1,2] 范博文 方坤 薛云飞[1] 赵嘉伟 张瑛 田川[1] 舒畅[1,3] Luo Mingyao;Fan Bowen;Fang Kun;Xue Yunfei;Zhao Jiawei;Zhang Ying;Tian Chuan;Shu Chang(State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease,Center of Vascular Surgery,Fuwai Hospital,National Center for Cardiovascular Disease,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100037,China;Department of Vascular Surgery,Fuwai Yunnan Cardiovascular Hospital,Kunming 650032,China;Department of Vascular Surgery,the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University,Changsha 410011,China)
机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院,北京协和医学院,国家心血管病中心,阜外医院血管外科,心血管疾病国家重点实验室,北京100037 [2]云南省阜外心血管病医院血管外科,昆明650032 [3]中南大学湘雅二医院血管外科,长沙410011
出 处:《中华普通外科杂志》2021年第5期341-345,共5页Chinese Journal of General Surgery
基 金:北京市科技重大专项(D171100002917004);国家自然科学基金(81870345)。
摘 要:目的:探讨胸主动脉腔内修复手术中近端锚定区位于Z0或Z1区时采用预开窗联合针刺原位开窗重建弓上动脉的效果。方法:回顾性分析2017年11月至2019年12月18例锚定区位于Z0或Z1区并采用预开窗联合针刺原位开窗重建患者的临床资料。结果:16例采用预开窗保留左颈动脉,2例采用预开窗保留无名动脉和左颈动脉,18例均采用原位开窗重建左锁骨下动脉。本组分支动脉保留成功率100%(38/38)。即时Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ型内漏各为0、4、1、4例。中位随访时间12个月,1例术后12个月因脑出血死亡,1例Ⅲ型内漏患者术后6个月行开胸主动脉弓替换术,无其他不良事件。结论:锚定区位于Z0或Z1区的胸主动脉腔内修复手术中,预开窗联合原位开窗的复合术式近期随访结果满意。两种技术的熟练掌握和病例的严格选择是减少并发症的关键。Objective To evaluate the safety and feasibility of the in-situ needle fenestration combined with the in vitro physician modified fenestration technique to reconstruct supra-aortic branches during thoracic endovascular aortic repair(TEVAR)for aortic arch lesions requiring landing at Z0 and Z1.Methods From Nov 2017 to Dec 2019,eighteen patients who underwent both the in-situ needle fenestration and the in vitro physician modified fenestration techniques to extend the proximal landing zone to Z0 and Z1 during TEVAR were included in our study.Results Sixteen patients underwent in vitro physician modified fenestration,two patients underwent in vitro physician modified fenestration to reconstruct both the left common carotid artery and the innominate artery.All eighteen patients received in-situ needle fenestration to preserve the left subclavian artery.Supra aortic branches were preserved in all patients(38/38,100%).There was no TypeⅠendoleak.TypeⅡendoleak was found in four paitnets(4/18).TypeⅢendoleak occurred in one patient(1/18).TypeⅣendoleak in four patients(4/18).TypeⅢendoleak needed open aortic arch repair 6 months later.The median follow-up time was 12 months.One(1/18)died in 12 months and the other patients were doing well.Conclusions The joint application of the in-situ needle fenestration and the in vitro physician modified fenestration to reconstruct supra-aortic branches during TEVAR for aortic arch pathologies requiring landing at Z0 and Z1 was satisfactory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33