检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:殷爱民 YIN Aimin(School of Law,Southwest University of Political Science & Law,Chongqing,401120,China)
出 处:《西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第3期77-83,共7页Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition
基 金:2020年度西南政法大学法学院学生科研创新项目“生态环境损害赔偿诉讼的制度困境与优化路径--以《若干规定》为视角”(FXY2020075)。
摘 要:司法实践表明,知识产权确认不侵权之诉受理条件存在侵权警告形式与审查标准不一、书面催告程序“前置性”存在争议等适用困境。在法律规范上,知识产权确认不侵权之诉确认利益的定位存在误识、受理条件较为笼统模糊。为了在诉权保障与滥诉预防之间达成平衡,克服“起诉难”现象,亟需对其受理条件进行细化,并构建类型化的受理条件规范。Judicial practice has shown that the acceptance of non-infringement claims for intellectual property rights has different infringement warning forms and review standards,and there are disputes over the"preliminary"of written reminder procedure.In terms of legal norms,the recognition of non-infringement claims of intellectual property rights confirms that the positioning of interests is misunderstood and the acceptance conditions are relatively general and vague.In order to achieve a balance between the protection of litigation rights and the prevention of abuse of litigation,and to overcome the"difficulty in prosecution"phenomenon,it is urgent to refine its acceptance conditions and build a type of acceptance criteria.
关 键 词:知识产权确认不侵权之诉 受理条件 确认利益
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.130