检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚慧芳 王超 卢杰[1,2,3] 张萌[1,2,3] 张新生 于德水 郑维列 YAO Huifang;WANG Chao;LU Jie;ZHANG Meng;ZHANG Xinsheng;YU Deshui;ZHENG Weilie(Res.Institute of Tibet Plateau Ecology,Tibet Agriculture&Animal Husbandry University;Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology of Tibet plateau,Ministry of Education;National Key Station of Field Scientific Observation&Experiment of Alpine Forest Ecology System in Nyingchi Tibet,Nyingchi Tibet,860000,China)
机构地区:[1]西藏农牧学院高原生态研究所 [2]西藏高原森林生态教育部重点实验室 [3]西藏林芝高山森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站,西藏林芝860000
出 处:《高原农业》2021年第3期226-231,324,共7页Journal of Plateau Agriculture
基 金:科技部国家野外科学研究观测站(生态系统)运行补助项目(西藏林芝高山森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究2015-2020);西藏农牧学院研究生创新计划项目(YJS2020-29)。
摘 要:本研究旨在分析不同冠幅级砂生槐空间分布格局及其种内关联性。选用点格局分析方法中的Ripley L函数,结果表明:(1)优势种砂生槐在0~25 m的空间尺度上表现为集群分布—随机分布—均匀分布。(2)砂生槐种群属于增长型,小灌木(C<1 ㎡)在0~19 m的空间尺度内表现为集群分布,在19~25 m的空间尺度上呈随机分布;中灌木(1 ㎡≤C<3 ㎡)随空间尺度的增大表现为随机分布—集群分布—随机分布—均匀分布—随机分布;大灌木(C≥3 ㎡)在整体尺度上都呈随机分布。(3)砂生槐的种内关联性以不相关和负相关为主,小灌木和中灌木的空间关联性较多样,表现为不相关—负相关—不相关—负相关;小灌木和中灌木、中灌木和大灌木几乎在整体空间尺度上都呈不相关,其关联性较小。This experiment was to analyze the spatial distribution pattern and intraspecific association of different canopy classes of Sophora moorcroftiana,and the Ripley L function in point pattern analysis was selected.The results showed that:(1)the dominant species of S.moorcroftiana exhibted cluster distribution—random distribution—uniform distribution on the spatial scale of 0~25 m;(2)S.moorcroftiana population belonged to the growth type,small shrubs(C<1 ㎡)in 0~19 m spatial scale showed cluster distribution,and in 19~25 m spatial scale showed random distribution;the middle shrub(1 ㎡≤C<3 ㎡)showed random distribution-cluster distribution-random distribution-uniform distribution-random distribution with the increase of spatial scale;large shrubs(C≥3 ㎡)were randomly distributed on the overall scale;(3)the intraspecific association of S.moorcroftiana was mainly non-correlated and negative correlation,and the spatial association of small shrub and middle shrub was diverse,showing non-correlated-negative correlation-non-correlated-negative correlation;small shrubs and middle shrubs, middle shrubs and large shrubs were almost irrelevant in the overall spatial scale, and the correlation is small.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.68.172