检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Ijasini John Tekwa John Mathew Laflen Abubakar Musa Kundiri Abdullahi Bala Alhassan
机构地区:[1]Department of Soil Science&Land Resources Management,Federal University Wukari,P.M.B,1020,Wukari Taraba State,Nigeria [2]USDA-ARS,National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory,Purdue University,Lafayette,IN,USA [3]Department of Soil Science,Faculty of Agriculture,University of Maiduguri,P.M.B,1069,Borno State,Nigeria
出 处:《International Soil and Water Conservation Research》2021年第1期11-25,共15页国际水土保持研究(英文)
摘 要:Evaluation of prediction models is crucial to achieving valid information on erosion processes and their management choices.WEPP model efficiency in predicting ephemeral gully(EG)erosion was recently tested and compared with both EGEM and empirical models.The models abilities to predict EG erosion were validated using measured estimates at the 6 eroding locations around Mubi area in Northeast Nigeria between April 2008 and October 2009.Each location consisted of 3 watersheds where data on soils,climate,slope,management practices,EG shapes and dimensions were collected.Data on relevant soil properties were collected in the field and then analyzed in laboratory.The mass of soil loss(MSL)predicted by empirical,EGEM and WEPP models were compared with the measured using paired T-test,regression graphs(r^(2)-values),error analysis,and analysis of variance(ANOVA)in a completely ran-domized design.The EG erosion losses varied significantly(P≤0.05)between sites and years.No sig-nificant(P≤0.05)differences were observed between measured and the empirically predicted aggregate MSL.The measured aggregate MSL strongly correlated with those predicted by empirical(r^(2)=0.67),than with EGEM(r^(2)=0.57),and WEPP(r^(2)=0.53)models.Slight over and under-prediction instances against the measured erosion were noted with all the models.The WEPP model was found to slightly over-predict MSL when compared to either the empirical or EGEM model.The prediction quality of the models was generally impressive.Future works should focus more on local inputs such as climate,plants,management,and tillage data for use with WEPP.
关 键 词:Empirical EGEM WEPP Ephemeral gully erosion Soil loss Mubi Northeast Nigeria
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49