检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马蓓洁 张静波[2] 蔡会欣[1] 戴冬雪[1] 刘丙木 胡晓娇 张丽楠 Ma Beijie;Zhang Jingbo;Cai Huixin;Dai Dongxue;Liu Bingmu;Hu Xiaojiao;Zhang Li'nan(Department of Medical Laboratory,Baoding First Central Hospital,Baoding 071000,Hebei,China;Department of Vascular Surgery,Baoding First Central Hospital,Baoding 071000,Hebei,China;Department of Intervention,Baoding First Central Hospital,Baoding 071000,Hebei,China)
机构地区:[1]保定市第一中心医院医学检验科,河北保定071000 [2]保定市第一中心医院血管外科,河北保定071000 [3]保定市第一中心医院介入科,河北保定071000
出 处:《血管与腔内血管外科杂志》2021年第1期76-80,99,共6页Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
摘 要:目的探讨导管接触性溶栓(CDT)联合机械碎栓方案治疗下肢深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的效果及对凝血、纤维蛋白溶解指标的影响。方法收集2018年1月至2020年6月保定市第一中心医院收治的120例下肢DVT患者临床资料,根据治疗方案的不同分为联合组(n=68)和对照组(n=52)。联合组患者采取CDT联合机械碎栓方案进行治疗,对照组仅采取CDT方案进行治疗,比较两组患者治疗前后的血栓弹力图参数血浆D-二聚体(D-D)、纤维蛋白原(Fib)、纤维蛋白降解产物(FDP)、溶栓再通效果。结果治疗3 d后,联合组患者的血管再通效果优于对照组(P<0.05);治疗7 d后,联合组的血管再通效果优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。联合组患者因溶栓导致的相关并发症的总发生率为4.41%(3/68),低于对照组患者的19.23%(10/52)(P<0.05)。治疗7 d后,两组患者的R、K值均高于本组治疗3 d时,MA值、α角均低于本组治疗3 d时(P<0.05)。结论与单用CDT相比,CDT联合机械碎栓方案治疗下肢DVT的效果更优,且对患者凝血功能的影响更小,安全性更高。Objective To explore the effect of catheter-directed thrombolysis(CDT)combined with mechanical thrombolysis in deep venous thrombosis(DVT)of lower extremities and its effect on coagulation and fibrinolysis indexes.Method A total of 120 patients with lower extremities DVT admitted to Baoding First Central Hospital from January 2018 to June 2020 were divided into the combination group(n=68,treated with CDT combined with mechanical thrombolysis)and control group(n=52,treated with CDT).The thromboelastogram parameters,plasma D-dimer(D-D),fibrinogen(Fib),fibrin degradation products(FDP),thrombolytic recanalization of the two groups were compared before and after treatment.Result After treatment for 3 days and 7 days,the maximum amplitude(MA)andαangles of the combined group were higher than those of the control group,and the clotting time(K)was shorter than that of the control group.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);Fib and FDP were lower than before treatment,and after 7 days of treatment,the D-D,Fib and FDP of the two groups were lower than those of this group after 3 days of treatment,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After 3 and 7 days of treatment,the recanalization of patients in the combined group was better than that in the control group,and the differences were of statistical significance(P<0.05).The total incidence rate of complications caused by thrombolysis in the combination group was 4.41%(3/68),which was lower than 19.23%(10/52)in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with CDT alone,the CDT combined with mechanical thrombolysis is more effective in the treatment of lower extremity DVT,with smaller impact on coagulation function and higher safety.
关 键 词:导管接触性溶栓 机械碎栓 深静脉血栓形成 凝血 纤维蛋白原
分 类 号:R543[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38