市民社会与家庭:基于人格权和财产权的分析  

Civil Society and Family:On the Basis of Personality and Property

作　　者：田毅松[1] Tian Yisong

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学马克思主义学院,北京100875

出　　处：《马克思主义理论学科研究》2021年第3期57-64,共8页Studies on Marxist Theory

基　　金：北京师范大学青年教师基金项目“从共同体到市民社会”(310422107)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：黑格尔在权利哲学中主要依据人格权和财产权论述家庭和市民社会及二者关系。马克思早期与晚期家庭理论存在着较大差异,但都与黑格尔法哲学存在着密切联系,将人格权和财产权作为分析家庭的工具。早期马克思构建自己政治理论时未给予家庭足够重视,但它在某种程度上仍然是在黑格尔法哲学框架中展开的论述的。马克思晚期开始在历史唯物主义框架内建构新的家庭理论,但仍然将人格权和财产权作为理论基点。人格权和财产权是马克思成熟家庭理论超越和扬弃黑格尔家庭理论和早期家庭学说的关键,同时也为建构中国现代家庭理论,推动形成社会主义家庭文明新风尚提供理论参照。Hegel’s theory of family should be understood on the basis of personality and property,which determine the persistence and dissolution of the family.Although there is a big difference between the family theory of early and later Marx,both are connected with Hegel’s theory of family.When early Marx criticized Hegel’s philosophy of right and constructed the political philosophy of his own,he did not pay more attention to the family,which is merged into the civil society.Later Marx stated a theory of family in accordance with an empirical anthropology within the framework of his historical materialism.In a word,we must interpret the family and civil society from the perspective of(free)personality and property.Therefore,if we want to explore the practical value of Marx’s family theory,we must protect the personality and property of the members of family,especially women,and enhance the family virtue construction and make the marriage law according to these.

关 键 词：家庭 市民社会 财产权 人格权 

分 类 号：A81[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]