欧美数据垄断的治理模式比较及对我国的借鉴研究  

Comparison of Data Monopoly Governance Models between Europe and America and its Application to China

作　　者：冉从敬[1,2] 刘先瑞 何梦婷 Ran Congjing;Liu Xianrui;He Mengting(School of Information Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan,430072;Shenzhen Research Institute,Wuhan University,Shenzhen,518000)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉430072 [2]武汉大学深圳研究院,深圳518000

出　　处：《信息资源管理学报》2021年第3期19-29,共11页Journal of Information Resources Management

基　　金：深圳市科学技术创新委员会深圳市科技计划项目“面向网络主权的政务大数据语义关联、全局融合与深度学习关键技术研究”(JCYJ20180302173459920);国家自然科学基金面上项目“多源大数据融合驱动的产业管理模型设计及领域实证研究”(71774123);教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目“大数据资源的制度规制和国家治理研究”(17JJD870001)研究成果。

摘　　要：数据垄断现象威胁国家数据主权、数字经济发展及个体数据权益,构建科学合理的数据垄断治理模式意义重大。本文通过网络及文献调研,获取了相关理论、欧美政策法规、组织机构及执法案例现状,归纳总结了欧美各自的反垄断分析模式。基于分析模式及其应用特征剖析得出美国侧重行为过程考量的审慎规制模式和欧盟侧重目的效果审查的严密管控模式,进一步分析借鉴其利弊及经验,并在结合我国治理现状基础上,提出符合我国实际的数据垄断治理模式构建对策,助力我国维护数据主权安全、保障数据权益和实现数字经济健康发展。Data monopoly threatens national data sovereignty,digital economy development and individual data rights,and it is significant to construct a scientific and reasonable data monopoly governance model.In this paper,we have obtained the relevant theories,European and American regulations,organizations and enforcement cases through online and literature research,and summarized the respective antitrust analysis models of them.Based on the analysis models and their application characteristics,this paper analyzes the prudent regulation model of the United States,which focuses on the process of behavior,and the tight control model of the European Union,which focuses on the review of the effects of the purpose,further analyzes and draws on their advantages,disadvantages and experiences,and proposes countermeasures for the construction of data monopoly governance model in line with China's actual situation.This will help China maintain data sovereignty and security,protect data rights and interests,and achieve healthy development of digital economy.

关 键 词：数据垄断 数据治理模式 数据主权 数据权益 数据市场 数字经济 

分 类 号：D912.29[政治法律—民商法学]