我国公安交通管理部门办理交通事故逃逸案件之实务问题与矫正  

Practical Problems and Rectification of Traffic Accident Escape Cases Handled by Public Security Traffic Management Departments in China

作　　者：郑才城[1] 毕华[1] Zheng Cai-cheng;Bi Hua(Department of Public Security,Guangdong Police College,Guangzhou 510230,China)

机构地区：[1]广东警官学院治安系,广东广州510230

出　　处：《政法学刊》2021年第2期121-128,共8页Journal of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：当前我国公安交通管理部门在办理交通事故逃逸案件实务过程中,对逃逸行为的界定以及对逃逸行为交通事故责任认定规则的适用上存在一定的误区,导致事故责任与相关法律责任对接时出现障碍。结合现行法律规定,基于交通事故责任的证据性质和成因责任功能,在逃逸事故的责任认定上,应当确立以过错行为的作用力为首要适用规则,在此基础上对逃逸行为施加适当的惩罚性责任。只有因事故后逃逸导致事故成因事实不清的情况下才适用推定方式确定当事人的责任。让交通事故责任认定回归其成因责任功能,以确保法律的有效实施,实现对交通事故的有效预防。At present, in the practical process of dealing with traffic accident escape cases, there are some misunderstandings in the definition of escape behavior and the application of the rules for determining the liability of traffic accidents, which leads to obstacles in the docking of accident liability and relevant legal liability. Combined with the current legal provisions, based on the evidence nature and cause liability function of traffic accidents, we should establish the force of fault act as the primary applicable rule in determining escape accident liability. On this basis, appropriate punitive liability should be imposed on the escape behavior. Only when the facts of the cause of the accident are not clear due to the escape after the accident, the presumption method is applied to determine the liability of the parties. Let the determination of traffic accident liability return to its cause liability function in order to ensure the effective implementation of the law and achieve the effective prevention of traffic accidents.

关 键 词：交通事故 逃逸 事故责任 认定规则 

分 类 号：D631.5[政治法律—政治学]