康海的文学态度与“复古俗”指向  

On Kang Hai’s Literary Attitude and His Advocate of Restoring the Ancient Ways

作　　者：孙学堂 SUN Xue-tang(School of Literature,Shandong University,Jinan,Shandong 250199,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学文学院,山东济南250199

出　　处：《苏州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2021年第3期136-146,共11页Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：文学史一般认为康海早年加入复古派阵营,是“前七子”领袖,落职闲住后颓然自放,诗文写作“不复精思”。但事实很可能相反:康海早年志在经世,并不以文章修辞之士自居,到晚年才把自己与李梦阳、何景明、徐祯卿等人并列为明代“文章之盛”的代表。他在放废前后对待写作、修辞和文章著述的态度是前后一贯的,并无明显变化。其《渼陂先生集序》所说的“复古俗而变流靡”概括了他本人的文章指向,与李、何、徐、边等人尊体重法的复古宗旨明显不同,而与古学复兴思潮早期代表如王云凤更相近。文学史上的“前七子”复古派经历了一个层累的建构过程,恰是七人中较为另类的康海和王九思为这个过程拉开了序幕。Literary history generally suggests that Kang Hai join the camp of restoring the ancient ways and was the leader of the“Former Seven Masters”in his early years,and that he stopped serious writing after being dismissed from Academician official.But the opposite is likely to be true:Kang Hai wanted to make a difference in politics in his early life and did not see himself as a writer like Li Mengyang and He Jingming until late in his life,referring them as the representatives of“the Hight of Literature”of Ming Dynasty.His attitude towards writing,rhetoric and literary works was consistent before and after his dismissal.What he said as“to restore the ancient ways and make them popular again”in The Preface to the Collected Works of Wang Jiusi summarized his intentions,and was different from other Masters,who valued the conventions,such as Li,He,Xu,Bian and so on,but closer to the early representatives in the trend of restoring the ancient ways like Wang Yunfeng.The“Former Seven Masters”had been through a long and tough process of construction,which happened to be started by the non-conformists like Kang Hai and Wang Jiusi.

关 键 词：康海 文学态度 修辞 复古 前七子 

分 类 号：I206.09[文学—中国文学]