机构地区:[1]北京医院药学部,国家老年医学中心,中国医学科学院老年医学研究院,北京市药物临床风险与个体化应用评价重点实验室(北京医院),北京100730
出 处:《中国医院用药评价与分析》2021年第5期577-583,共7页Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-use in Hospitals of China
基 金:北京市自然科学基金(No.7113164)。
摘 要:目的:系统评价氯替泼诺联合玻璃酸钠治疗中重度干眼的有效性和安全性,为其临床合理应用提供循证证据。方法:计算机检索the Cochrane Library、PubMed、EMBase、中国知网、万方数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库,纳入氯替泼诺联合玻璃酸钠治疗中重度干眼的随机对照试验(研究组患者的治疗方案为氯替泼诺联合玻璃酸钠滴眼,对照组患者单独使用玻璃酸钠滴眼),检索时限为从建库至2021年2月。由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用RevMan 5.4软件进行荟萃分析(Meta分析)。结果:共纳入8篇文献,包括771例患者(1416只眼),其中研究组患者387例(710只眼),对照组患者384例(706只眼)。Meta分析结果显示,有效性方面,研究组患者的总有效率(OR=3.14,95%CI=1.81~5.45,P<0.0001)、干眼症状评分(MD=-9.49,95%CI=-9.94~-9.04,P<0.00001)、治疗2周后泪膜破裂时间(BUT)(MD=1.92,95%CI=1.72~2.12,P<0.00001)、治疗4周后BUT(MD=3.56,95%CI=3.22~3.91,P<0.00001)、治疗6周后BUT(MD=4.40,95%CI=3.97~4.83,P<0.00001)、治疗8周后BUT(MD=5.14,95%CI=4.81~5.48,P<0.00001)、治疗2周后角膜荧光素染色评分(MD=-2.27,95%CI=-2.58~-1.97,P<0.00001)、治疗6周后角膜荧光素染色评分(MD=-2.42,95%CI=-2.77~-2.06,P<0.00001)、治疗8周后角膜荧光素染色评分(MD=-2.67,95%CI=-2.94~-2.40,P<0.00001)和泪液分泌试验(SchirmerⅠ)结果(MD=0.20,95%CI=0.11~0.29,P<0.00001)均显著优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义;安全性方面,两组患者不良反应发生率的差异无统计学意义(OR=0.76,95%CI=0.37~1.57,P=0.46>0.05)。结论:现有证据表明,氯替泼诺联合玻璃酸钠治疗中重度干眼安全、有效,起效快,较单独使用玻璃酸钠有明显优势。结果证据受纳入研究的数量和质量限制,上述结论有待更多高质量研究予以验证。OBJECTIVE:To systematically review the efficacy and safety of loteprednol combined with sodium hyaluronate in the treatment of moderate-severe dry eye METHODS:Randomized controlled trials on loteprednol combined with sodium hyaluronate in the treatment of moderate-severe dry eye(the research group was given loteprednol combined with sodium hyaluronate for eye-dropping,while the control group was given sodium hyaluronate alone)were retrieved from the Cochrane Library,PubMed,EMBase,CNKI,Wanfang database and CBM from base-building to Feb.2021.After independently literature screening,information extracting and bias evaluation by two researchers,RevMan 5.4 was adopted to conduct Meta-analysis.RESULTS:Totally 8 studies were involved,including 771 patients(1416 eyes),of which 387 patients(710 eyes)were in the research group,and 384 patients(706 eyes)were in the control group.Results of Meta-analysis indicated that in terms of effectiveness,the total effective rate(OR=3.14,95%CI=1.81-5.45,P<0.0001),score of dry eye symptom(MD=-9.49,95%CI=-9.94--9.04,P<0.00001),breakup time of tear film(BUT)at 2 weeks after treatment(MD=1.92,95%CI=1.72-2.12,P<0.00001),BUT at 4 weeks after treatment(MD=3.56,95%CI=3.22-3.91,P<0.00001),BUT at 6 weeks after treatment(MD=4.40,95%CI=3.97-4.83,P<0.00001),BUT at 8 weeks after treatment(MD=5.14,95%CI=4.81-5.48,P<0.00001),score of corneal fluorescein staining at 2 weeks after treatment(MD=-2.27,95%CI=-2.58--1.97,P<0.00001),score of corneal fluorescein staining at 6 weeks after treatment(MD=-2.42,95%CI=-2.77--2.06,P<0.00001),score of corneal fluorescein staining at 8 weeks after treatment(MD=-2.67,95%CI=-2.94--2.40,P<0.00001)and result of Schirmer test(Schirmer Ⅰ)(MD=0.20,95%CI=0.11-0.29,P<0.00001)of research group were significantly higher those of the control group,with statistically significantly differences;in terms of safety,there was no statistical significance in the difference in incidences of adverse drug reactions between two groups(OR=0.76,95%CI=0.37-1.57,P=0.46>0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Presen
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...