检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘思彤 徐淑娴 綦斐[4] 刘哲峰 施琳玲 吴一波 LIU Sitong;XU Shuxian;QI Fei;LIU Zhefeng;SHI Linling;WU Yibo(Health Communication Eorking Committee of China Medical Doctor Association,Beijing 100073,China;Peking University Health Science Center,Beijing 100191,China;Shenyang Pharmaceutical University,Benxi 117004,Liaoning Province,China;Health Education Division,Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Qingdao,Qingdao 266033,Shandong Provingce,China;XiangYa School of Public Health,Central South University,Changsha 410000,China;Nantong University,Nantong 226019,Jiangsu Province,China;Key Research Base of Philosophy and Social Social Sciences in Shaanxi Province,Health Culture Research Center of Shaanxi,Xi'an 712046,China)
机构地区:[1]中国医师协会健康传播工作委员会,北京100073 [2]北京大学医学部,北京100191 [3]沈阳药科大学,辽宁本溪117004 [4]青岛市疾病预防控制中心健康教育科,山东青岛266033 [5]中南大学湘雅公共卫生学院,长沙410000 [6]南通大学,江苏南通226019 [7]陕西(高校)哲学社会科学重点研究基地-健康文化研究中心,西安712046
出 处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2021年第7期612-616,共5页Chinese Mental Health Journal
基 金:陕西省社会科学基金项目(2020M016),青岛市医疗卫生重点学科建设项目(2020B047)。
摘 要:目的:探究新冠肺炎流行期间公众生活质量及相关因素。方法:使用问卷星收集有效问卷2026份[男991人,女1035人],采用12条目简短生命质量量表(SF-12)、自编公众对新冠肺炎的认知调查问卷(COVID-PPS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、领悟社会支持量表(PSSS)进行评估,采用多重线性回归和结构方程模型探究生活质量的相关因素。结果:SF-12中位得分为65.4(53.9,81.1)分。回归分析结果显示,COVID-PPS得分、生活在东北地区、单身、家庭人均月收入≥5000元与SF-12总分正向关联(β=0.05、0.04、0.04、0.06);SAS得分、SDS得分、>60岁、生活在华中地区、未接受过正规教育或受教育程度为小学与SF-12总分负向关联(β=-0.31、-0.30、-0.08、-0.04、-0.07、-0.04);结构方程模型显示,COVID-PPS、SAS、SDS得分与SF-12总分存在相关(λ=0.06、-0.33、-0.29)。结论:疫情下公众的生活质量处于中等偏上程度。60岁以上,华中地区,受教育程度低的人群生活质量更差,焦虑抑郁症状可能对公众的生活质量造成负面影响。Objective:To explore the quality of life and its related factors among the public during the COV-ID-19 epidemic.Methods:A total of 2026 questionnaires were collected through wjx.cn(991 males,1035 females).The12-item short form Health Survey(SF-12),Public Perception Survey of COVID-19(COVID-PPS),Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS),Self-Rating Depression Scale(SDS)and Perceived Social Support Scale(PSSS)were implermented to evaluate the quality of life of the public,and multiple linear regression and structural equation model were used to analyze the related factors.Results:The median score of SF-12 was 65.4(53.9,81.1).Accord-ing to the multiple linear regression,the SF-12 scores were positively associated with the scores of COVID-19 PSS,living in Northeastern China,being single and family per capital income more than 5000 yuan(β=0.05,0.04,0.04,0.06),and negatively associated with the scores of SAS and SDS,age of>60 years,living in Central Chi-na,and with no formal education or primary education(β=-0.31,-0.30,-0.08,-0.04,-0.07,-0.04).According to the structural equation model,COVID perception,scores of SAS and SDS were correlated with the SF-12.scores(λ=0.06,-0.33,-0.29).Conclusion:The quality of life of the public may be fairly good during COV-ID-19.People who are over 60 years old,living in Central China,with poor education background tend to have poo-rer life quality than other people.Anxiety and depression may negatively affect the life quality of the public.
分 类 号:R195[医药卫生—卫生统计学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28