检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任丽莉[1] 崔德旗 REN Li-li;CUI De-qi(School of Law,Xinjiang University,Urumqi,Xinjiang,830047;School of Law,Wuhan University,Hubei,Wuhan,430072)
机构地区:[1]新疆大学法学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830047 [2]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072
出 处:《新疆大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2021年第4期16-23,共8页Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“新疆去极端化立法实施效果研究”(19BFX008)。
摘 要:去极端化工作的开展是贯彻总体国家安全观的现实需要,是推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的有益实践,更是保障宪法实施的有力体现。在党和国家的正确领导下,我国的去极端化工作始终在法治轨道上进行,作为根本大法的宪法为其提供了最高的规范指引与根本依据。文章通过分析宪法文本中的相关基本原则、制度与条款对去极端化治理的合宪性基础进行规范解析,旨在从根本法意义上规范和指引去极端化在法治轨道上的持续推进;进而探寻去极端化实践的宪法实施路径,为去极端化的立法、执法等制度体系的构建与完善提供一种宪法学研究进路的思考。the endeavor of de-radicalization is a practical need to implement a holistic approach to national security,a useful practice to promote the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity,and a powerful embodiment of safeguarding the implementation of the Constitution.China's de-radicalization work has been carried out under the rule of law,while the Constitution functions as the highest normative guidance and fundamental basis.This paper analyzes the relevant basic principles,institutions and provisions in the Constitutional text to interpret the constitutional basis for de-radicalization,aiming to regulate and guide the continuous promotion of de-radicalization under the rule of law and explore the path of constitutional implementation in the practice of de-radicalization,in the hope of providing a perspective of constitutional jurisprudence studies in the formulation and improvement of the institutional system of legislation and enforcement on de-radicalization.
关 键 词:去极端化 宪法文本 规范分析 宪法遵守 宪法执行
分 类 号:D911.8[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222