检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王洁[1] 黑小杰[1] 张丽丽[1] WANG Jie(Department of blood purification,the seventh people's hospital of Zhengzhou,Zhengzhou,Henan,450000,China)
机构地区:[1]郑州市第七人民医院血液净化室,河南郑州450000
出 处:《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》2021年第8期732-734,共3页Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
摘 要:目的探讨同伴支持对肾衰竭血液透析患者焦虑抑郁情绪及生活质量的影响。方法选择2018年2月—2020年2月本院收治的120例肾衰竭血液透析患者作为研究对象,根据随机数表法分为对照组与观察组两组,每组各60例。对照组给予常规血液透析护理,观察组在对照组基础上联合同伴支持互助干预,比较两组患者的焦虑抑郁情绪变化及生活质量变化。结果观察组的SAS评分、SDS评分下降幅度显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组的SF-36评分上升幅度相对高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对肾衰竭患者在血液透析治疗期间辅以同伴支持互助干预,能够有效改善患者的焦虑抑郁情绪,提高患者的生活质量。Objective To explore the effect of peer support on anxiety and depression emotions and quality of life in hemodialysis patients with renal failure.Methods 120 patients underwent hemodialysis due to renal failure in our hospital from February 2018 to February 2020 were selected as the research objects and divided into control group and observation group according to the random number table method,with 60 cases in each group.The control group was given routine hemodialysis nursing,and the observation group was given peer support and mutual aid intervention on the basis of the control group.The changes of anxiety and depression and quality of life of the two groups were compared.Results The decrease of SAS score and SDS score of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);the increase of SF-36 score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions Peer support and mutual aid intervention could effectively improve the anxiety and depression of patients with renal failure and improve their quality of life.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175