顾颉刚疑古立场的变与不变--兼谈中华民族研究的理论自觉  

Changing and Unchanging of Gu Jiegang’s Skeptical Position on Ancient History:Also on Theoretical Self-Consciousness of Chinese Nation Studies

作　　者：奂平清[1] Huan Pingqing

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学社会学理论与方法研究中心

出　　处：《江海学刊》2021年第3期186-195,255,共11页Jianghai Academic Journal

基　　金：中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目“中华民族认同与族际社会整合研究”(项目号:13XNI010)资助。

摘　　要：关于顾颉刚在其学术生涯中疑古立场上是否有变化的问题,学界一直都有争论。在古史研究上,顾颉刚总体延续了疑古立场,其主要原因一是中国古史系统自身存在缺陷,二是疑古思想的反封建性为其持续开展古史辨伪提供了合法性。但在民族研究上,顾颉刚的疑古立场有明显转变,其民族思想从早期古史辨打破“民族出于一元”,转向建构“中华民族是一个”的理论;从“反传统的民族主义”转向“重传统的民族主义”。深入分析顾颉刚在中华民族研究上疑古立场的转变及其理论自觉路径,对于新时代铸牢中华民族共同体意识研究具有重要启示意义。Whether Gu Jiegang’s skeptical position on Chinese ancient history has changed during his academic career has been debated in academic circles. In the study of ancient history, Gu Jiegang has generally continued his skeptical position, mainly because of the defects of the Chinese ancient history system itself, and because the anti-feudal nature of his skeptical thinking has provided legitimacy for his continued research on Chinese ancient history in a skeptical position. However, in the studies of nation, Gu Jiegang’s skeptical position has significantly changed, and his ethnic thought has shifted from deconstructing “the Chinese nation comes from one” of his early ancient history discourse to constructing the theory of “the Chinese nation is one”, and from “anti-traditional nationalism” to “traditional nationalism”. The study of Gu Jiegang’s change of skeptical position on Chinese ancient history and his theoretical self-consciousness on the study of the Chinese nation has important inspiration for the study of forging a sense of Chinese community in the new era.

关 键 词：顾颉刚 疑古立场 民族研究 理论自觉 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]