检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵芃[1] ZHAO Peng
出 处:《外语与外语教学》2021年第3期23-30,147,共9页Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基 金:天津市哲学社会科学规划项目“批评话语分析学派及分支理论方法比较研究”(项目编号:TJWW17-020)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:“再情景化”曾被范柳文认为是批评话语分析的一个新工具,但是,当批评话语分析进入批评话语研究的新阶段,“指向秩序”则成为更具解释力的概念性工具。基于此,本文讨论“指向秩序”这一批评话语研究新发展出的概念工具,包括其含义、应用及应用价值。之后讨论“再情景化”和“指向秩序”这两个概念的异同,指出“指向秩序”和“再情景化”对于剖析语言结构与社会结构之间的间接联系具有同样的价值,但在借助语言分析揭示社会范畴之间的不平等关系方面,“指向秩序”更具分析潜力。讨论表明,概念性工具的更新代表着批评话语研究的新发展,同时,一定的概念性工具对于批评话语研究的案例研究非常必要,不仅可以体现理论原则和辅助分析框架,还可以增强阐释话语与社会辩证关系的可信性和专业性。“Recontextualization”is considered as a new tool of critical discourse analysis(CDA)by van Leeuwen(2008).But when CDA enters its new stage of critical discourse studies(CDS),“indexical order”turns to be a more interpretive conceptual tool.This article discusses this newly developed tool in terms of what it is meant,how it is applied,and what significance it has for critical discourse studies.In doing so,the similarities and differences between“recontextualization”and“indexical order”are delineated:These two terms have similar significance for exploring the mediation between language structures and social structures,but“indexical order”has more potentials for seeing the inequality between social categories via linguistic analysis.Two points are made in this discussion:1)the development of CDA is seen in the update of conceptual tools;2)conceptual tools are essential for case studies in CDS,both in their embodying CDS theoretical principles and applying analytical frameworks and in the specialized accountability they give rise to in specific case studies of the dialectical relationship between discourse and society.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117