行政复议申请人资格的“利害关系”标准--基于“冯书军案”的分析  

Administrative Reconsideration Applicant Qualification of“Interest”Standard--Based on the analysis of“Feng Shujun case”

作　　者：陈林燕 CHEN Lin-yan(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海200042

出　　处：《天水行政学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2021年第3期80-86,共7页Journal of Tianshui College of Administration

摘　　要：适格行政复议申请人应当与行政行为之间存在法律上的利害关系。“冯书军案”作为关于行政复议申请人资格的代表性裁判,确立了“法律上的利害关系”这一判断标准。从判决中可以看出,最高人民法院的判断思路中暗含了保护规范理论,与行政诉讼原告资格保持一致。在司法实践中法院虽没有直接使用“保护规范理论”这一表述,但实际上从“黄陆军案”开始就埋下了保护规范理论的种子。行政复议作为化解行政争议的主渠道,理论上应当适用相比行政诉讼更加广泛的申请人资格标准,但目前相关立法和审判实践皆未突破行政诉讼原告资格的范畴,新《行政复议法》的修订应当对此作出回应。Applicant of qualified administrative reconsideration should have legal interest relationship with administrative act.Feng Shujun case,as a representative judge of the applicant’s qualification for administrative review,established the judgment standard of“legal interest”.It can be seen from the judgment that the Supreme People’s Court implied the theory of protection norms in its judgment,which was consistent with the plaintiff’s qualification in administrative litigation.Although the court did not use the expression of“protection norm theory”directly in judicial practice,it actually planted the seeds of protection norm theory from the beginning of“Huang Lujun case”.As the main channel to resolve administrative disputes,administrative reconsideration should theoretically apply more extensive applicant qualification standards than administrative litigation.However,at present,relevant legislation and trial practice have not broken through the category of plaintiff qualification in administrative litigation.The revision of the new Administrative Review Law should respond to this.

关 键 词：行政复议 申请人资格 利害关系 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]