检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王德林 Wang Delin
机构地区:[1]北京市西城区人民法院
出 处:《北京政法职业学院学报》2021年第2期52-57,共6页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
摘 要:绿色原则的含义为节约资源和保护生态环境。实现物尽其用,达到效率状态,也是绿色原则的内在要求。绿色原则在合同纠纷中有广阔的运用空间,但目前司法实践对绿色原则的运用还存在违背法律原则适用规律、裁判尺度不一、说理不充分等问题。《民法典》合同编绿色条款规定的义务相比传统合同义务有其独特性。法院在司法实践中需要探索构建绿色裁判规则,从审查合同效力、确定当事人权利义务、判断合同是否解除及处理合同终止的后果等方面,将绿色原则贯穿案件始终加以考量。公益诉讼制度的引入亦有助于绿色原则的贯彻。The green principle requires saving resources and protecting the ecological environment.It is also its inherent requirement to make the best use of everything and achieve efficiency.The green principle has broad application space in contract disputes,but there are still some problems in the application of the green principle in judicial practice,such as violation of the law of application of legal principles,different judgment standards,and insufficient reasoning.Compared with traditional contract obligations,the obligations stipulated in the green clauses of the"Civil Code"contract are unique.In judicial practice,courts need to explore the construction of green judgment rules,from the aspects of reviewing the validity of the contract,determining the rights and obligations of the parties,judging whether the contract is terminated,and handling the consequences of the termination of the contract.The introduction of the public interest litigation system also contributes to the implementation of the green principle.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200