论警察职务防卫行为的本质  

On the Nature of Police Duty Defense

作　　者：徐翕明 Xu Ximing

机构地区：[1]广西民族大学法学院,广西南宁530000

出　　处：《行政与法》2021年第5期121-128,F0003,共9页Administration and Law

基　　金：2020年广西哲学社会科学规划项目的阶段性成果,项目编号:20FFX005;2020年广西一流学科(法学)培育项目的阶段性成果,项目编号:30242020402;2020年广西民族大学引进人才科研启动项目的阶段性成果,项目编号:2020SKQD04。

摘　　要：司法实践对于警察在执行职务中导致被害人伤亡的案件定性不统一,其分歧点在于如何界定职务防卫行为的本质。正当防卫说具有混淆国家公权力与公民私权利界限的风险,容易导致在公权力的行使中违背比例原则。二元属性说的出发点是基于正当防卫与履行职务间达到平衡,但由此得出的结论并不具有信服力。因此,将警察职务防卫行为的本质定性为依照《人民警察法》及相关法律作出的履行职务行为,即坚持职务行为说的立场较为适宜。In judicial practice,the nature of cases in which the victims ar e injured or killed in the police’s performance of duty is not unified, and the difference lies in how to define the nature of duty defense behavior.The theory of justifiable defense has the risk of confusing the boundary between the public power of the state and the private rights of citizens,which easily leads to the violation of the principle of proportionality in the exercise of public power.The starting point of dual attribute theory is to achieve a balance between self-defense and performance of duty,but the conclusion is not convincing. Therefore,it is more appropriate to define the nature of police duty defense behavior as the performance of duty behavior in accordance with the people’s police law and relevant laws,that is,to adhere to the position of duty behavior theory.

关 键 词：警察职务防卫 正当防卫说 职务行为说 《人民警察法》 

分 类 号：D922.14[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]