检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:庞园 曾慧 张明珠 PANG Yuan;ZENG Hui;ZHANG Mingzhu(Institute of Water Science Guangzhou,Guangzhou 510220,China)
出 处:《广东水利水电》2021年第6期63-68,共6页Guangdong Water Resources and Hydropower
摘 要:基于28个采样点2018年雨季和旱季19项指标的监测数据,运用改进的灰色关联法评价了流溪河流域的地下水质量,并结合流溪河流域地下水的实际情况,与单因子评价法的评价结果进行了对比。改进的灰色关联法评价结果表明,研究区地下水质量综合评价结果较好,雨季优于旱季,基岩裂隙水优于松散岩类孔隙水,中游优于下游。单因子评价法和改进的灰色关联法的评价结果差别较大甚至部分结论完全相反,比较而言改进的灰色关联法的评价结果更符合实际。Based on the monitoring data of 19 indicators of 28 sampling points in rainy season and dry season in 2018,improved grey correlation method is used to evaluate the groundwater quality of Liuxihe River Basin.Combined with the actual situation of groundwater in Liuxihe river basin,the evaluation results are compared with the single factor evaluation method.The results of improved grey correlation method show that the comprehensive evaluation results of groundwater quality in the study area are better,the rainy season is better than the dry season,the bedrock fissure water is better than the loose rock pore water,and the middle reaches is better than the downstream.The evaluation results of single factor evaluation method and improved grey correlation method are quite different,and even some conclusions are completely opposite.In comparison,the evaluation results of improved grey correlation method are more in line with the reality.
关 键 词:灰色关联法 单因子评价法 流溪河流域 地下水质量
分 类 号:X824[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.179