论商业秘密的秘密性要件——以中美贸易争端为背景  

The secrecy elements of trade secret--From the perspective of trade disputes between US and China

作　　者：林威 LIN Wei(Collge of Law,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084

出　　处：《福建农林大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2021年第3期93-105,共13页Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家电网专项课题(20192002154)。

摘　　要：当前商业秘密的秘密性要件正在被边缘化。秘密性是商业秘密的核心要件之一,权利人需要通过证明成本的投入,完成秘密性的初步举证义务。历史上,商业秘密财产权理论滋生了秘密性要件,标志着商业秘密保护制度的独立以及现代商业秘密概念的产生。随后,美国自由主义的衰退导致商业秘密财产权理论崩溃,商业秘密的保护开始建立在不正当竞争理论之上,秘密性要件也随之瓦解。秘密性要件的瓦解导致商业秘密保护范围扩张,但在技术的冲击下,侵权行为却日趋“中性”。由此,商业秘密逐渐形成超级保护。这冲击了专利政策,影响了劳动力的正常流动。鉴于此,建议将秘密性的初步举证要求转移到价值性要件之上。Currently,the secrecy element of trade secret is being marginalized.Secrecy had always been perceived as one of the core elements of trade secret in past.The owner of trade secret had to prove the investment to complete the preliminary burden of proof.In history,the property theory of trade secret bred the secrecy element,which marked as the independence of trade secret protection system and the emergence of modern trade secret concept.Subsequently,the decline of liberalism led to the collapse of the property theory of trade secret.The protection of trade secret began to form on the theory of unfair competition,and the secrecy element also collapsed,which leaded to the expansion of the protection scope of trade secret.However,due to the impact of technology development,the infringement behavior was becoming more and more"neutral".Thus,trade secret gradually formed"super protection",which contracted the patent policy and affected the flow of labor.Therefore,the preliminary proof requirement of secrecy should be transferred to the value element.

关 键 词：秘密性 商业秘密 财产权 不正当竞争 超级保护 专利政策 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]