中国水路货物运输案件司法诉讼现状、特征及启示——基于中国裁判文书网案例的实证分析  

The situation,characteristics and enlightenment of judicial litigation of the cases of domestic carriage of goods by waterway--an empirical study based on cases published by China Judgements Online

作　　者：黄晶[1] HUANG Jing(Law School,Shanghai Maritime University,Shanghai 201306,China)

机构地区：[1]上海海事大学法学院,上海201306

出　　处：《中国海商法研究》2021年第2期84-91,共8页Chinese Journal of Maritime Law

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目“《海商法》修改基本理论与主要制度研究”(16FFX010)。

摘　　要：通过对中国裁判文书网所检索到的水路货物运输合同纠纷案例进行分析比对,发现在司法实践中此类案件多由基层人民法院审理,法院管辖权对案件审理结果影响重大,适用《中华人民共和国民法典》第一编“总则”和第三编“合同”不能满足司法审判的需要,此类案件审理参照已废止的《国内水路货物运输规则》效果良好,通过司法解释、合同并入《国内水路货物运输规则》、推行内河航运标准合同不能完全解决当前所存在的法律问题,需要《中华人民共和国海商法》修订时对水路货物运输予以规制。Through analyzing and comparing the cases of domestic carriage of goods by waterway retrieved from China Judgements Online,it is found that in judicial practice,such cases are mostly tried by the basic people’s courts,and the court’s jurisdiction has a significant impact on the trial results.The application of the General Provisions Part and the Contracts Part of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China cannot meet the needs of judicial adjudication and trial thereof by reference to the abolished Regulations on Domestic Carriage of Goods by Waterway proves effective.Applying judicial interpretations,incorporating Regulations on Domestic Carriage of Goods by Waterway into contract and making inland waterway standard contracts cannot solve the existing problems completely.It is suggested that special rules be made for the domestic carriage of goods by waterway in the revised Chinese Maritime Code in the future.

关 键 词：水路货物运输 司法诉讼 裁判文书 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]