检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张芳 袁嫄 Zhang Fang;Yuan Yuan(School of Finance,Guangdong University of Finance&Economics,Guangzhou 510320,China)
出 处:《统计与决策》2021年第10期47-51,共5页Statistics & Decision
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(13CTJ017)。
摘 要:文章分别计算了2011—2017年我国30个省份的生态环境—经济社会复合系统的综合发展度、协调度和协调发展度,从纵向和横向两方面对各省份的生态文明建设协调发展程度进行分析,并对比各省份的生态环境与经济社会这两个子系统的发展度大小。结果显示:全部省份的协调发展度均有所提升;从协调发展度的空间分布来看,以2017年为例,华东地区和中南地区的协调发展度较好,东北地区和西南地区次之,华北地区和西北地区最差;我国大部分省份仍然面临经济社会发展水平相对滞后的情形,这与我国仍是发展中国家的现实相吻合。This paper calculates the comprehensive development degree, coordination degree and coordinated development degree of the eco-environment-socio-economic complex system of 30 provinces in China from 2011 to 2017, then analyzes the coordinated development degree of the ecological civilization development of each province from both vertical and horizontal aspects,and finally compares the development degree of the eco-environmental and economic-social subsystems of each province. The results show that the coordinated development degree of all provinces has been improved. From the perspective of spatial distribution of coordinated development degree, taking 2017 for an example, the coordinated development degree of East China and Central China is better, followed by Northeast and Southwest China, North China and Northwest China. Most provinces in China are still facing the situation of relatively backward level of economic and social development, which is consistent with the reality that China is still a developing country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222