检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡婷 HU Ting(Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学法律硕士教育中心,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《哈尔滨学院学报》2021年第6期68-72,共5页Journal of Harbin University
摘 要:因第三人的介入致使旅游合同不能履行或者履行不能实现合同目的,是引发旅游纠纷的一种普遍现象,且由于第三人范围界定的不明确,使得由其故意或过失造成违约之责任承担规则存在争议。文章首先界定了旅游法律关系中第三人的范围,并从违约原因的角度对其进行了类型化区分;然后,对履行辅助人和与旅行社不存在任何法律联系的第三人行为造成合同违约的责任进行了系统化分析。The third party’s intervention causes the tour contract to fail to perform or fulfill the purpose of the contract.It is a common phenomenon that causes tourism disputes.Because of the unclear definition of the scope of the third party,there is a dispute about the liability rules caused by the intentional or negligent of the third party.Firstly,the paper defines the scope of the third party in the legal relationship of tourism and classifies it from the perspective of the reasons for breach of contract.Secondly,the responsibility of the performance assistant and the third party who has no legal connection with the travel agency caused the breach of contract is systematically analyzed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.32.191