游离时风之外:清代史家邵晋涵的史学褒贬求实特色  

Out of the Style of the Times:the Derogative-appreciative and Realistic Characteristics of Historian Shao Jinhan in Qing Dynasty from the Perspective of Historiography

作　　者：周威 Zhou Wei(Biquan Academy, School of Philosophy, History and Culture, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, Hunan China)

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学碧泉书院·哲学与历史文化学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《西安文理学院学报（社会科学版）》2021年第2期63-69,共7页Journal of Xi’an University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：邵晋涵分纂稿具有多言褒贬的显著特色,然而《四库全书总目》对邵晋涵褒贬之语多有删削,而偏重通过考证方法求得历史之真,这在一定程度上反映出褒贬与求实之间的背离。清乾嘉时期的学界呈现出注重求实而不喜史学褒贬的风气。然而,褒贬是邵晋涵阐发自身史学见解,展现史学经世功能的重要途径,因此不可废弃。面对褒贬与求实日益分化的趋势,邵晋涵试图从理论与实践两个层面进行调适,力求实现褒贬与求实的统一。邵晋涵对于褒贬求实关系的处理,与乾嘉时风具有明显差异,具有重要的学术探讨价值。Shao Jinhan’s manuscripts are characterized by many words of praise and criticism.However,in the The Annotated Catalog of the Emperor’s four Treasures,Shao Jinhan’s words of praise and criticism are often abridged,and emphasis is placed on seeking historical truth through textual research,which reflects the deviation between praise and criticism and seeking truth from facts to a certain extent.The academic circles in the Qing-Qian-Jia period showed a trend of paying attention to seeking truth rather than appreciating or criticizing historiography.However,praise and criticism is an important way for Shao Jinhan to expound his own historical views and show the function of historiography,so it cannot be abandoned.Facing the increasingly divergent trend of praise and criticism and seeking truth,Shao Jinhan tried to adjust from two levels of theory and practice,and strive to achieve the unity of praise and criticism and seeking truth.Shao Jinhan’s handling of the relationship between praise,criticism and truth-seeking is obviously different from that of Ganjia,which is of great academic value.

关 键 词：邵晋涵 分纂稿 褒贬求实 《四库全书总目》 史学特色 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]