欺诈性抚养关系之认定与救济  

Identification and Relief of Fraudulent Foster Relationship

作　　者：鲍伊帆 BAO Yi-fan(Zhangzhou Vocational and Technical College,Minnan Normal University,Zhangzhou 363000,Fujiang Province,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海200050

出　　处：《景德镇学院学报》2021年第2期111-116,共6页Journal of JingDeZhen University

摘　　要：因相关法律规范的欠缺,各地法院在处理欺诈性抚养纠纷时存在的“同案不同判”问题较为突出。对于“欺诈性抚养”之内涵,应当从时间、主体以及主观等三个维度更迭。关于请求权基础的选择,否定说、行为无效说、无因管理说和债权让与说均无适用之基础。侵权行为说同时支持财产损害和精神损害赔偿,在构成请求权竞合时,基于行权效率之考量可优先适用。在侵权之诉无法涵盖的诸多情形中,支出费用型不当得利返还请求权之适用具有重要价值。Due to the lack of relevant legal regulations,there is a prominent problem of“different judgments in the same case”in dealing with fraudulent foster disputes.The connotation of“fraudulent foster”should be changed in three dimensions:time,subject and subjectivity.As for the choice of claim basis,there is no applicable basis for negation,invalidity,management without cause and assignment of claims.The tort claim supports both property damage and spiritual damage compensation.When it constitutes the concurrence of claims,it can be preferentially applied on the basis of consideration of exercise efficiency.In many cases that cannot be covered with the tort litigation,the application of the claim for restitution of payment unjust enrichment is of great value.

关 键 词：欺诈性抚养 非给付型不当得利 侵权行为 请求权基础 

分 类 号：D923.9[政治法律—民商法学]