国家史观视域下新印度史学的叙事建构:从雅利安文明到莫卧儿帝国  

The Narrative Construction of New Indian Historiography from the Perspective of the Statist Notion of History: From the Aryan Civilisation to the Mughal Empire

作　　者：王立新[1] Wang Lixin

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学历史文化学院和印度研究中心

出　　处：《世界历史》2021年第2期102-121,151,共21页World History

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“部落社会理论视野下的印度现代早期农业社会研究”(项目编号:15BSS010)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：以《剑桥印度史》和《牛津印度史》为代表的正统印度史学以詹姆斯·米尔在《英属印度史》一书中阐述的"印度文明"概念为基础,借用比较语言学的研究成果建构了正统印度史学的历史叙事:雅利安叙事。而以《新剑桥印度史》为代表的新印度史学则以"早期现代"概念为基础建构了一种完全不同的历史叙事:莫卧儿帝国叙事。尽管这两种印度历史叙事都是在现代西方史学传统中的国家史观视域下进行的,但它们却建立起完全不同的意义空间。正统印度史学的历史叙事建构了一种传统性的历史空间,而新印度史学的历史叙事则建构起一种现代性的历史空间。The orthodox Indian historiography presented by The Cambridge History of India and The Oxford History of India established the historical narrative of Aryans in the reference frame of the Indian civilisation defined by James Mill in The History of British India by virtue of the comparative linguistics.By contrast,the new Indian history tried to constitute a distinct historical narrative which took the Mughal empire as its origin in the reference frame of early modernity,which can be seen in the The New Cambridge of India.Although both narratives have been shaped by the statist notion of history which was rooted in the modern Western historiography,they established heterogeneous spaces of meaning:the orthodox Indian historiography made a historical space of tradition while the new Indian historiography constructed a historical space of modernity.

关 键 词：新印度史学 《新剑桥印度史》 国家史观 雅利安文明 莫卧儿帝国 

分 类 号：K093.51[历史地理—历史学]