国家行为责任观念的差异——基于英美、德国和中国新冠疫情初期应对政策的比较与思考  

Different Ideas on the Responsibility of State:Some Observations on the anti-COVID-19 Policies in UK/US,Germany and China

作　　者：张浚[1] 周弘[2,3] ZHANG Jun;ZHOU Hong

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院欧洲研究所 [2]中国社会科学院学部 [3]中国社会科学院大学

出　　处：《欧洲研究》2021年第2期1-24,I0002,共25页Chinese Journal of European Studies

摘　　要：国家责任观念体现了一个国家或社会内部的基本价值观念,而国家的行为责任提供了观察一国基本价值观念的重要视角。新冠疫情期间,英美、德国和中国采取了不同的防控措施,这些差异反映了不同国家内部对国家行为责任的不同认知。对其观念形成的历史进行简单梳理可以发现,一个国家主流价值观念的形成是由其资源禀赋、文化历史和现实国情决定的,具有内在的规律性。构筑未来的全球治理体系,需要跨文化的视角,在理解不同文化形态的基础上,努力实现不同文化和文明的和平共处与共同发展。During the COVID-19 pandemic,the UK/US,Germany and China have taken significantly divergent approaches to address the challenges in terms of public health,economy and social welfare.This divergence might be attributed to the differences in their prevalent ideas on the responsibility of the State and on what constitutes legitimate state intervention.For the purpose of achieving a better understanding of the policy divergence in the above-mentioned countries,this article tries to explore the evolution of their ideas of the responsibility of state.It could be concluded that these ideas have been shaped by the resource endowments,cultural history and economic/political/social conditions in a certain country,thus implying an inherent historical logic.Therefore,the difference of ideas might prevail in the future.Having this in mind,a cross-cultural perspective is needed in order to construct a sustainable global governance system that will foster peaceful coexistence and common development of various cultures and civilizations.

关 键 词：国家行为责任 新冠疫情 自由主义 社会市场经济 大同世界 

分 类 号：D523[政治法律—政治学]