检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张涵卿 陈帅锋[1,2] ZHANG Hanqing;CHEN Shuaifeng(Peopled Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038;Peking University,Beijing 100191)
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100038 [2]北京大学,北京100191
出 处:《中国药物滥用防治杂志》2021年第3期365-370,共6页Chinese Journal of Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment
摘 要:当前,新精神活性物质问题是全球禁毒领域的热点和难点问题。中美两国新精神活性物质问题的现状存在不同的特点。通过对中美两国新精神活性物质在认定方式、预警机制、列管标准、列管程序及后续司法处置等方面的比较研究,从预警机制建设,建立具有中国特色的临时列管制度,完善已列管新精神活性物质量刑标准,三个方面提出进一步优化我国对新精神活性物质管制模式的建议。At present, the issue of new psychoactive substances(NPS) is a hot and difficult issue in the field of global drug control. The present situation of the issue of new psychoactive substances in China and America has different characteristics. Through a comparative study of the Identification Methods, early-warning mechanism, listing standards, listing procedures and subsequent judicial disposal of new psychoactive substances in China and the United States, from the perspective of early-warning mechanism construction, in order to perfect the quality standard of new fine and living materials, the author puts forward three suggestions to further optimize the control mode of new fine and living materials in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30