检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:骆康 刘耀彬[1,2] 戴璐[1] 陈霄 卓冲 LUO Kang;LIU Yaobin;DAI Lu;CHEN Xiao;ZHUO Chong(School of Economic&Management,Nanchang University,Nanchang 330031,China;Research Center of the Central Economic and Social Development,Nanchang University,Nanchang 330031,China;School of Social Development and Public Policy,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China)
机构地区:[1]南昌大学经济管理学院,江西南昌330031 [2]南昌大学中国中部经济社会发展研究中心,江西南昌330031 [3]复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院,上海200433
出 处:《中国土地科学》2021年第5期46-56,共11页China Land Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“新时代绿色发展绩效评估与美丽中国建设道路研究”(18ZDA047);国家自然科学基金面上项目“生态安全约束下的环鄱阳湖城市群空间网络演化机理与动态模拟”(41871155)。
摘 要:研究目的:探讨农地租赁双方在信息不对称条件下的讨价还价能力,并揭示其异质性问题及背后原因。研究方法:利用信息博弈的双边随机前沿模型(SFA2tier)对不同阶段和不同地区下中国农地租赁市场交易双方议价能力及影响因素进行分析。研究结果:(1)从总体样本看,承租户比出租户具有更强的议价能力,出租户利用自身议价能力将租金抬高28.64%,承租户利用自身议价能力将租金降低34.25%,使得实际租金低于基准租金5.61%。(2)中国农地租赁双方的议价能力差距随时间呈现出不断扩大的趋势,但这种议价能力差距并不是由地区经济水平的差异性引起的,而是由地理区位条件和粮食主产区差异所决定,即承租户与出租户议价能力的差距在东、中、西部地区均为5.50%左右,而在南方地区和北方地区各为7.94%和3.67%,在非粮食主产区和粮食主产区却分别为7.20%和3.64%。(3)城乡因素、受教育程度、户口类型、性别、健康状况、年龄、经营规模等因素均是导致议价能力差距的根本原因,而居住在农村、受过高等教育、农业户口、男性、身体不健康、中老年、小经营规模农户都能够有效降低这种差距。研究结论:应当从实行农地租赁价格补贴、制定差别化的基准租金、完善农地租赁信息服务中心等方面来促进农地流转效率。The purposes of the study are to explore the bargaining power in farmland leasing under the condition of information asymmetry,and to reveal the heterogeneity and the reasons behind it.The research method is to use bilateral stochastic frontier model(SFA2tier)of information game to analyze the bargaining power and influencing factors in different stages and regions of China’s farmland leasing market.The results indicate that:1)from the general sample,the tenants has stronger bargaining power than the renters,the renters use his bargaining power to raise the rent by 28.64%,and the tenants use his bargaining power to reduce the rent by 34.25%,which results in the actual rents being 5.61% below the benchmark rent.2)The gap of bargaining power of farmland leasing in China has been widening,however,the gap of bargaining power is not caused by differences in regional economic levels but by the natural geographic conditions and differences in the main grain producing areas.The difference in bargaining power is 5.5%in the eastern,central,western region,7.94%in the southern and 3.67% in the northern,7.20% in non-gain and 3.64%in gain producing areas,respectively.3)Urban-rural factors,educational level,household registration type,gender,health status,age,operation scale and so on are the underlying causes of the gap in bargaining power,and living in rural areas,higher education,agricultural household,men,poor health,middle-aged and elderly,small-scale operation farmers can effectively reduce this gap.In conclusion,the efficiency of farmland transfer should be promoted by enacting the farmland leasing price subsidy,establishing the differentiated benchmark rent and improving the farmland leasing information service center.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49