检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:安琪 AN Qi(School of Economics and Management,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,China)
出 处:《图书馆研究》2021年第3期85-93,共9页Library Research
摘 要:以教育部批准设立且数据可获取的71所教育部部级科技查新工作站为研究对象,通过网络调研访问查新站主页的方式,调查当前高校科技查新服务的定价情况,从定价因素、地区差异、机构类型差异、定价依据与方法角度进行分析,发现查新定价中存在的不合理因素,查新收费存在定价因素混乱、定价机制不合理、定价方法欠科学等问题,以此为基础提出了政府指导定价、差异化定价和弹性化定价的收费策略。并提出相应合理的收费策略,为科技查新服务的科学、合理定价提供参考。Taking 71 ministerial-level sci-tech novelty retrieval workstations approved by the Ministry of Education as the research object,this paper investigate the current pricing situation of sci-tech novelty retrieval services in universities by visiting the homepage of novelty retrieval workstations on the Internet,analyze them from the perspectives of pricing factors,regional differences,institutional types,pricing basis and methods,find out there are some unreasonable factors in the pricing of novelty retrieval,some problems in the pricing of novelty retrieval,such as confusion of pricing factors,unreasonable pricing mechanism and unscientific pricing method.On this basis,the charging strategies of government guided pricing,differentiated pricing and flexible pricing are put forward.And put forward the corresponding reasonable charging strategy to provide reference for scientific and reasonable pricing of sci-tech novelty retrieval service.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.149.239.180