“总体性”与“开放性”的延续——再读《空间的生产》导读  

To Keep“Totality”and“Openness”:An Introduction of the Special Issue“Rereading The Production of Space”

作　　者：杨舢[1] Yang Shan

机构地区：[1]南京大学建筑与城市规划学院

出　　处：《国际城市规划》2021年第3期1-4,22,共5页Urban Planning International

基　　金：国家自然科学基金“以过程和使用为导向、多元主体影响下的‘过渡使用’城市设计方法与策略研究”(51878327)。

摘　　要：本文阐述了推出"再读《空间的生产》"专辑的主要原因。选择在这个时间点以《空间的生产》为主题展开专题讨论,首先有缅怀和致敬其作者列斐伏尔之意。这本经典著作早已成为空间和都市研究绕不开的里程碑,但是与其声名日隆相随的是误读和曲解。更重要的是,以《空间的生产》和《日常生活批判》为代表的列斐伏尔思想开启了诸多问题域,这些问题域与当下中国的现实处境有着深刻的内在关联。不同于其他大师文集的讨论,这次专辑讨论并不局限于纯粹的城市规划和设计范畴,也不以达成某种标准理解为目的。列斐伏尔思想中的"总体性"和"开放性"的立场决定了此次专辑的这些特点。通过这一专题研究,我们希望能够在城市与空间研究中延续"总体性"和"开放性"的立场。The article gives an account of the reasons why the special issue"Rereading The Production of Space"is launched.First of all,it is dedicated to memorize the Master,Henri Lefebvre.His classical work The Production of Space has already become the milestone which contemporary urban and spatial research cannot evade.However,misreading and misinterpreting have accompanied with its increasing reputation.Moreover,it is the problematique Lefebvre opens up in his theory and its intrinsic connection to Chinese realistic situation that has the important implication.Unlike other issues of Master anthology,this issue neither limits itself in the sheer discipline category of urban planning and design,nor aims to achieve some standard understandings.It is the totality and openness inherent in Lefebvrian thoughts that determine the characteristics of the issue.Through the research,we hope the urban and spatial research could remain the totality and openness.

关 键 词：空间的生产 总体性 开放性 矛盾辩证法 空间矛盾 

分 类 号：F03[经济管理—政治经济学] A81[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]