基于PubMed数据库的近10年高影响因子期刊假针刺对照研究文献计量学分析  

Bibliometrics Analysis of Control Study of Sham Acupuncture in Journals with High Impact Factors in Recent 10 Years Based on PubMed

作　　者：孔金莉 周明学[2] 史红赛 刘红旭[1] KONG Jinli;ZHOU Mingxue;SHI Hongsai;LIU Hongxu(Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Capital Medical University,Beijing 100010,China;Beijing Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100010,China;School of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100069,China)

机构地区：[1]首都医科大学附属北京中医医院,北京100010 [2]北京市中医研究所,北京100010 [3]首都医科大学中医药学院,北京100069

出　　处：《中国中医药信息杂志》2021年第7期54-59,共6页Chinese Journal of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：北京市医院管理局重点医学专业发展计划(ZYLX201817);国家中医药管理局中医药循证能力建设项目(2019XZZX-XXG001)。

摘　　要：目的分析PubMed数据库高影响因子期刊中假针刺对照研究相关文献的现状及问题,为优化针刺研究设计提供参考。方法检索PubMed数据库2010年1月1日-2020年1月1日收录的采用假针刺对照的临床试验和动物实验类型文献,选取影响因子>5的期刊刊载文献,分析文献的数量、来源期刊、影响因子、涉及病种、引用情况、假针刺对照设计等。结果共纳入文献37篇,来源于10种期刊。人体8个系统的疾病均有涉及,其中消化系统、运动系统、生殖系统、神经系统疾病相关文献居多。假针刺对照研究相关文献被引次数总体偏低。常用的假针刺对照为非穴浅刺对照及非穴可伸缩针假刺对照,常用的假电针对照为穴位直刺无电流对照及非穴直刺无电流对照,常用的非经非穴选取方法为远端非经非穴选取。结论当前高质量的假针刺对照研究文献的数量、影响力均有待进一步提升。建议研究者应根据针刺的病种、部位及实际情况选择合理的对照方式,规范化的假针刺对照设置方式是针刺研究领域亟待解决的问题。Objective To analyze the current situation and problems of the literature about the control study of sham acupuncture in journals with high impact factor in PubMed;To provide reference for optimizing the research design of acupuncture.Methods To searched PubMed database for literatures on clinical trials and animal experiments with sham acupuncture control from January 1,2010 to January 1,2020,selected journals with impact factor>5,and analyzed the number,source journals,impact factors,diseases involved,citation,sham acupuncture control design.Results Totally 37 articles were included,which came from 10 journals.In this study,the diseases of eight systems of human body were all involved,among which literature about digestive system,motor system,reproductive system and nervous system diseases ranked the most.The number of citation of sham acupuncture control study was generally low.The commonly used sham acupuncture control was non-acupoint shallow needling and non-acupoint retractable needling.The commonly used sham electroacupuncture control was acupoint needling without current and non-acupoint needling without current.The commonly used non-acupoint selection method was remote non-acupoint selection.Conclusion At present,the quantity and influence of literature about high-quality sham acupuncture control study need to be further improved.Researchers should choose a reasonable control method according to the disease type,location and actual situation of acupuncture.The standardized setting of sham acupuncture control is an urgent problem in the field of acupuncture research.

关 键 词：学术影响力 假针刺对照 PUBMED 文献分析 

分 类 号：R2-05[医药卫生—中医学]