论算法创作物的可版权性与著作权归属  

The Copyrightability and the Authorship of the Generated Content of Algorithm Creation

作　　者：徐小奔[1] Xu Xiaoben

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心

出　　处：《东方法学》2021年第3期41-55,共15页Oriental Law

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“数据主权规制下数据知识产权保护机制研究”(项目批准号:18CFX068)阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：算法时代,在机器学习技术与大数据技术的驱动下,算法创作进一步促进了人工智能的自主性。坚守作者中心主义范式下的主客体一致性标准,将无法为算法创作物提供有效的法律保护。事实上,读者中心主义对现代著作权制度也产生了深远的影响,并在作品独创性方面为科技作品、实用作品的著作权保护提供了坚实的理论基础。读者中心主义所确立的主客体分离评价标准为算法创作物视为作品提供了独创性判断的理论路径。算法自由就是作品表达自由的技术表现,故而可使算法创作物具备独创性。在否定人工智能法律主体的前提下,可以通过委托作品的权属分配机制,一方面有限承认人工智能的机器作者身份;另一方面将著作权全部归属给人类开发设计者。;In the era of algorithm,algorithm creation has further promoted the autonomy of artificial intelligence,driven by the technology of machine learning and big data.If we still adhere to the subject-object consistency standard under the author-centrism paradigm,the algorithmic creations would not be provided with effective legal protection.In reality,the reader-cen-trism has also had a far-reaching influence on the modern copyright system.The reader-centrism has already provided a solid theoretical foundation for the copyright protection of scientific works and works of applied art in the perspective of the originality of works.The evaluation standard which separates the subject and the object,established by reader-centrism,has provided a theoretical path for the originality judgment of treating algorithmic creations as works.The freedom of algorithm reveals the freedom of expression of works in the technical aspect,which means algorithmic creations can he original.Under the premise of denying the legal subjectivity of artificial intelligence,we can use the ownership distribution mechanism of commissioned works for reference.On one hand,acknowledging the authorship of artificial intelligence machine in limited scope.On the other hand,attributing all copyrights to human developers and designers.

关 键 词：算法创作 算法创作物 可版权性 作品独创性 读者中心主义 机器作者 

分 类 号：DF523[政治法律—民商法学]