范长江离职《大公报》原因再探讨  

Revisiting FAN Chang-jiang’s Resignation from Ta Kung Pao

作　　者：龙伟[1] LONG Wei

机构地区：[1]重庆大学新闻学院,重庆401331

出　　处：《新闻大学》2021年第5期56-65,123,共11页Journalism Research

基　　金：重庆市社科抗战专项“抗战时期《华西教会新闻》翻译及研究”(2017ZDKZ16)阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：范长江离职《大公报》是新闻史学界的一段"公案"。既有研究有"政治观点冲突""人事纠纷""多种原因共同作用"等多种解释,从不同侧面分析了范长江离职的原因。本文从前人未曾留意的"离职时间""记者群体左转"等角度补充论述,认为范长江的离职应放在特定的时空环境下考察。武汉危局下何去何从?这既是范长江的职业选择,也是其政治选择。范长江与《大公报》互生怨懑只是范长江离职的表象,范在政治上与中国共产党的日益亲密、"青记"的迅速发展、进步记者的群体"左转",种种倾向都表明离职《大公报》是范长江的必然选择。Why Fan Chang-jiang left Ta Kung Pao is an unsolved case in the field of journalism history.There are various explanations in previous studies,including"conflict of political views","personnel dispute"and"the joint effect of various reasons",etc,These studies analyze the reasons that Fan left Ta Kung Pao from different aspects.This paper makes a supplementary discussion on"resignation time"and"journalists’left turn",which have not been noticed before,and thinks that fan his resignation should be investigated in a specific space-time environment.What to do under the Wuhan crisis?This is both Fan Chang-jiang’s career choice and his political choice.The mutual resentment between Fan Chang-jiang and Ta Kung Pao is just the appearance of resignation.Fan’s increasing intimacy with the CCP in politics,the rapid development of Qing Ji,and the progressive journalists’left turn all indicate that Fan’s resignation from Ta Kung Pao is an inevitable choice.

关 键 词：范长江 《大公报》 “青记” 

分 类 号：G21O.9[文化科学—新闻学]