洛布本《地理志》残篇55b的史源学考察  

A Criticism of Provenance of fr. 55b(Jones) in Loeb Classical Library Edition of Strabo’s Geographica

作　　者：刘军[1] Liu Jun

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学世界古典文明史研究所,吉林长春130024

出　　处：《史学史研究》2021年第2期49-58,共10页Journal of Historiography

基　　金：国家社科基金冷门“绝学”和国别史等研究专项项目“公元前4世纪至前3世纪黑海跨区域贸易——基于古希腊文铭文与钱币窖藏的考察”(项目编号:18VJX020)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：通过史源学的考察可以确定,洛布本斯特拉波《地理志》残篇55b的出处实为尤斯塔提奥斯对狄奥尼西奥斯的评注;其整理者琼斯编订新辑逸文往往径用孔策论文中的录文而不查核原书,以致于在转换出处注释体例时改正为误。实际上,由残篇编次、异文选定与出处信息等项判断,洛布本新辑逸文多袭自孔策论文,这为认识辑佚文本形成的复杂过程提供了一个案例。而琼斯采用不同于孔策的注释体例则可视为当时学术规范转变的缩影。洛布本残篇55b出处的误植也说明,希腊罗马史研究不应忽略古典著作版本学的知识。Through a criticism of provenance, it is able to confirm that the actual origin of fr. 55 b(Jones) in Loeb Classical Library edition of Strabo’s Geographica is Eustathius’ commentary on Dionysius Periegetes, i.e. Eust., comm. ad D.P. 516, and the compiler of Loeb Classical Library edition of Strabo’s Geographica, H. L. Jones, edited his fragments according to the texts in R. Kunze’s articles without collating the original ones, which caused an error in the process of changing the citation system. In fact, judging from the order of the fragments, the selections of variant readings, and the information of quotations, the new collection of fragments in Loeb Classical Library edition normally followed the opinions in Kunze’s articles, which provides an example for understanding the complicated process of the formation of a fragment collection. Jones’ adoption of a different citation system with Kunze’s, however, should be regarded as a projection of the transition of the academic norm. Furthermore, the false origin of fr. 55 b(Jones) in Loeb Classical Library edition of Strabo’s Geographica strongly suggests to the historians for attention to bibliography.

关 键 词：史源学 洛布古典丛书 斯特拉波 《地理志》 辑佚 

分 类 号：K091[历史地理—历史学]