检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨佳霖 Yang Jialin(New York University,New York 10012,the U.S.A.)
机构地区:[1]纽约大学,纽约10012
出 处:《城市建筑》2021年第15期147-149,共3页Urbanism and Architecture
摘 要:水泥生产目前是人为碳排放的第四大来源。随着这些排放物的不断增加,自然界面临着前所未有的环境灾难的威胁。Ferrock是一种创新的铁基化合物,是水泥的碳负替代品,它是利用多种生产过程中产生的废弃物制造的建筑材料。在本文中,笔者将着眼于碳排放量和能源消耗比较Ferrock和传统波特兰水泥(OPC)对环境的影响。下文包括了全面的文献综述和对Ferrock生产的深入环境评估,以及其从原料提取到固化和硬化阶段的所有处理步骤,并将结果与以前的OPC生命周期分析进行了比较。初步分析发现,Ferrock既具有取代OPC的诱人潜力,又能为促进环境可持续发展做出巨大贡献。Cement production currently constitutes the fourth largest source of anthropogenic carbon emissions.As these emissions continue to rise,the natural world faces the threat of an unprecedented environmental catastrophe.Ferrock,an innovative iron-based binding compound,presents a carbon-negative alternative to cement that utilizes a variety of waste streams to produce a versatile building material.In this paper,the author will compare the environmental impacts of Ferrock and Ordinary Portland Cement(OPC),focusing specifically on their contribution to carbon pollution and energy consumption.This paper includes a comprehensive literature review,and an in-depth environmental assessment of Ferrock production,from the point of its raw materials extraction,to its curing and hardening phase,and all processing steps in between.The results have been compared to a previous life-cycle analysis of OPC.This preliminary analysis finds that Ferrock has the intriguing potential to replace OPC,and contributes significantly to the promotion of an environmentally sustainable future.
关 键 词:新型建筑材料 波特兰水泥 全球暖化潜势 Ferrock能源绩效 成本分析
分 类 号:TU5[建筑科学—建筑技术科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13