附属医院临床医生信息搜寻行为调查——以北京市医学院校附属医院或教学医院为例  

Information seeking behavior of clinicians in affiliated hospitals

作　　者：丁思瑀 马路[1,3] Ding Siyu;Ma Lu(Schoolof Medical Humanities,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100069,China;Office of Library International Cooperation,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100069,China;Office of International Cooperation,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100069,China)

机构地区：[1]首都医科大学医学人文学院,北京100069 [2]首都医科大学图书馆,北京100069 [3]首都医科大学国际交流与合作处,北京100069

出　　处：《医学教育管理》2021年第3期311-318,共8页Medical Education Management

摘　　要：目的了解医学院校附属医院临床医生的信息素养水平、信息搜寻行为习惯,为更有针对性地服务附属医院临床医生提供参考依据。方法以在北京市医学院校附属医院或临床教学医院工作的临床医生为调查对象发放调查问卷,对回收的444份有效问卷进行统计分析;对首都医科大学附属医院的9名临床医生实施个人深入访谈,使用内容分析法对访谈材料进行分析。结果 (1)临床医生的信息搜寻能力可以满足工作需求;(2)低年资医生的信息搜寻频率明显高于中高年资医生;(3)无在研项目的医生其信息搜寻频率与搜寻所得数量均明显偏低。结论医学院校图书馆和附属医院图书馆应联合探索信息服务新范式,为临床医生提供更有针对性的服务,让信息服务的内容、时间、方式和形式更符合临床用户的需求。Objective To understand the information literacy level and information seeking behavior habits of clinicians in affiliated hospitals of medical colleges and universities,and to provide reference for more targeted services for clinicians in affiliated hospitals.Methods A total of 444 valid questionnaires were collected from clinicians working in affiliated hospitals of medical colleges or clinical teaching hospitals in Beijing,and personal in-depth interviews were conducted among 9 clinicians in affiliated hospitals of Capital Medical University.Results①The information seeking ability of clinicians can meet their work needs;②The information seeking frequency of junior doctors is significantly higher than that of senior doctors;③The frequency and quantity of information seeking were significantly lower for doctors without research projects.Conclusion Medical universitylibraries and affiliated hospital libraries should jointly explore a new paradigm of information service,provide more targeted services for clinicians,and make the content,time,mode and form of information service more in line with the needs of clinical users.

关 键 词：附属医院 临床医生 信息搜寻行为 问卷调查 个人深入访谈 

分 类 号：G251.5[文化科学—图书馆学]