检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:管海涛 顾文涛[1] GUAN Hai-tao;GU Wen-tao
出 处:《中国听力语言康复科学杂志》2021年第4期274-277,共4页Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“社会情感的语音生成与认知的跨语言跨文化研究”(13&ZD189);江苏高校哲学社会科学优秀创新团队建设项目“融合人文-教育-科技-康复的语言学交叉创新研究”(2017STD006)。
摘 要:目的了解4~5岁以普通话为母语的学龄前人工耳蜗植入儿童和健听儿童对语音情绪感知能力的差异,为听障儿童康复提供参考。方法从儿童康复中心、正常幼儿园选取28人参与测试,其中人工耳蜗植入儿童和健听儿童各14人。在安静的环境下,通过电脑连接扬声器,给儿童播放事先录制的高兴、生气和悲伤的语音,要求儿童判断听到的语音属于何种情绪。结果(1)人工耳蜗植入儿童对所有情绪的识别正确率显著低于正常听力儿童(P<0.001);(2)健听儿童在高兴和生气情绪间容易出现混淆,人工耳蜗植入儿童则容易混淆所有情绪。结论以普通话为母语的学龄前人工耳蜗植入儿童在语音情绪感知上存在困难,康复机构在制订康复计划时需要考虑到儿童情绪方面的训练内容。Objective To understand the perception ability of vocal emotional prosody in 4-5 years old Mandaring-speaking children with cochlear implants and normal hearing children,and to provide reference and suggestions for hearing rehabilitation of cochlear implanted children.Method Fourteen children with cochlear implant from rehabilitation center and fourteen children with normal hearing from kindergarten participated in the test,The recorded voices were played by a computer in a quiet room,the children need to judge the emotion type of voice stimulus.Results The CI group showed significantly lower recognition accuracy(P<0.001)than the NH group.In addition,NH children were easily have confusion between happy and angry emotions,CI children were likely to confuse all emotions.Conclusions The experimental results confirmed that Mandarin-speaking CI children have difficulty in vocal emotional perception.This requires the rehabilitation institutions and schools to consider children’s emotional rehabilitation when formulating rehabilitation plans.
分 类 号:R764.43[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科] R493[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117