检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶鹏[1] TAO Peng(School of Government,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China)
出 处:《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第3期37-43,共7页Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(19CGL001)。
摘 要:通过聚焦应急预案与风险管理关系演化及政策意涵,构建二者关系演化模型,可以厘清风险管理与应急预案之间的双向效能激发、现实障碍及优化路径。未来我国应急预案编制与体系建设将呈现出以整合风险管理为主轴的风险管理专门预案和以风险分析为基础的应急响应预案共存的格局。迈向整合风险管理的应急预案编制与体系建设,需要以风险管理的政治优先性、多尺度整合、动态风险沟通、韧性风险管理结构以及政策工具创新为基本路径。This paper focuses on the evolution and policy implications of the relationship between emergency planning and risk management,and establishes an evolution model of the relationship between them to clarify the two-way efficiency stimulation,realistic obstacles and optimization path between risk management and emergency planning.In the future,the compilation and system construction of emergency plans in China will present a coexistence pattern of specialized risk management plans based on integrated risk management and emergency response plans based on risk analysis.The preparation of emergency plan and system construction towards integrated risk management need to take the political priority of risk management,multi-scale integration,dynamic risk communication,resilient risk management structure and policy tool innovation as the basic path.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249