检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:文雯 童丽灵 吴丹[1] WEN Wen;TONG Li-ling;WU Dan(Haikou Hospital Affiliated to Xiangya Medical College of Central South University,Hainan Province,Haikou570208,China)
机构地区:[1]中南大学湘雅医学院附属海口医院,海南海口570208
出 处:《中国当代医药》2021年第19期235-237,共3页China Modern Medicine
基 金:海南省卫生计生行业科研项目(19A200003)。
摘 要:目的比较无针输液接头两种消毒方式的效果。方法选取2019年1—3月中南大学湘雅医学院附属海口医院的26例护士为研究对象,26例护士均参加对照组和观察组。对照组护士使用2%安尔碘棉签消毒无针输液接头150次,观察组护士使用独立包装4 cm×4 cm 75%酒精棉片消毒无针接头150次。比较两组的无针输液接头消毒操作时间及使用时间、耗材成本、消毒后再污染情况、临床护士的满意度及意愿度。结果对照组和观察组消毒后不被污染和消毒后再污染的占比分别为(88.0%、12.0%,94.0%、6.0%),观察组的消毒后不被污染比例高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组和观察组的耗材成本和消毒操作时间分别为(61.6±1.62)元、(36±3)s,(37.8±0.82)元、(16±1)s,观察组的耗材成本低于对照组,消毒操作时间短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组和观察组的护士满意度和意愿度分别为(46.0%、46.0%,92.0%、92.0%),观察组护士满意度和意愿度高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论使用独立包装4 cm×4 cm 75%酒精棉片,对无针输液接头进行维护,方便护士使用揉搓法消毒接头凹槽处,有效清除接头凹槽处残留微生物。缩短消毒操作时间,节约耗材成本,有效降低无针输液接头消毒后再污染,提高临床护士使用的满意度和意愿度,值得临床推广应用。Objective To compare the effect of two disinfection methods of the needleless infusion connector.Methods Twenty-six clinical nurses in Haikou Hospital Affiliated to Xiangya Medical College of Central South University from January to March 2019 were selected as the research subjects,and all the 26 nurses participated in the control group and the observation group.The 0.2%Entoiodine cotton swabs were used by nurses in the control group to disinfect the needleless infusion connectors for 150 times,and the individually wrapped 4 cm×4 cm 75%alcohol cotton pads were used by nurses in the observation group to disinfect the needleless infusion connectors for 150 times.The disinfection operation time and use time of needleless infusion connectors,consumables costs,re-contamination after disinfection,clinical nurses'satisfaction and willingness degrees were compared between the two groups.Results The proportions of non-contamination after disinfection and re-contamination after disinfection in the control group and the observation group were 88.0%,12.0%,94.0%and 6.0%,respectively.The proportion of non-contamination after disinfection in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The consumables cost and disinfection operation time of the control group and the observation group were(61.6±1.62)yuan and(36±3)s,and(37.8±0.82)yuan and(16±1)s,respectively.The consumables cost of the observation group was lower than that of the control group,and the disinfection operation time of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The degrees of satisfaction and willingness of nurses in the control group and the observation group were 46.0%,46.0%,92.0%and 92.0%respectively.The degrees of satisfaction and willingness of nurses in the observation group were higher than those of nurses in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Using the
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.209.172