检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:金华 JIN Hua(School of Political Science and Public Management,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201600,China)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学政治学与公共管理学院,上海201600
出 处:《中北大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第4期44-51,共8页Journal of North University of China:Social Science Edition
基 金:2019年度江苏高校哲学社会科学研究项目:循环反应视阈下大学生群体性事件生成机理与治理路径研究(2019JSB633)。
摘 要:在互联网加持的信息化时代,权力场域下的特权意识、随意逾矩、乱法胡为等诸多问题很容易触发网络问责。网络问责是实体问责在互联网时代的发展与嬗变。互联网去权威化及分散化特质为公众话语表达创造了平等、开放、自由的能量场,并推动传统问责范式的转变。以网络曝光、网络扒粪和网络审判为实践样态的网络问责,并不尽然能达到网络问责的理想状态。网络空间权利滥用、责任缺失等诸多流弊,导致迫害性问责、偏激问责、无序问责等异化现象。如何规范网络问责,使之走向法治化、制度化轨道,是打造健康问责生态的关键。本文的研究重点是以制度化构建、网民自我赋能及网络公共性重塑等策略,建构有序的网络问责生态,进而启发政府规范权力运行,提升网络问责的应对能力。In the information age,abuses of power such as privilege,arbitrariness,misconducts and so on can be hold accountable through network.The decentralized network provides fair,open and free platforms for people to express their opinions,which promotes the transformation of traditional ways of holding the abuses of power accountable.However,network exposure,muckraking and trial may lead to many problems that hold the abuses of power accountable through forced,extreme and abnormal ways.Holding the abuses of power accountable in a legal and institutionalized fashion is the very core to build a healthy network accountability system.This article suggests constructing a well-organized network accountability system to facilitate governments to regulate the operation of their power and increase their capability to respond the claims that seek to hold the abuses of power accountable in network.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.127