检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李冰 蔡梦玲[1] LI Bing;CAI Mcngling(School of Information Resource Management,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学信息资源管理学院,北京100872
出 处:《档案学通讯》2021年第4期93-100,共8页Archives Science Bulletin
基 金:中国人民大学重大规划项目“西域文献整理、挖掘与抢救性保护”(20XNLG06)。
摘 要:纸张的粘连严重影响档案的长期保存和利用,揭开粘连纸张是抢救历史档案并对其开展后续修补、托裱等修复工作的前提。以糟朽且粘连历史档案为研究对象,开展锅蒸—闷润法和冷冻—闷润法揭粘实验,通过水分、pH及色差测定比较两种方法的揭粘效果和对纸张性能的影响,发现两种方法均能有效揭开粘连纸张,其中锅蒸—闷润法能够改善纸张脆化问题,具有较强的除污能力,适用于揭粘污染严重的档案;冷冻—闷润法除污能力相对较弱,具有对纸张颜色影响小,可操作性强的特点,适用于揭粘污染程度低但板结严重的档案。值得注意的是,两种揭粘方法均会使纸张酸性增强。The adhesion of paper affects the preservation and utilization of archives seriously.Uncovering conglutinate paper is the prerequisite for rescuing historical archives and carrying out follow-up repair,consolidation and other conservation treatments.We set up an experiment on historical archives which suffer from blocking and deterioration problems by using steaming-moistening method and freezing-moistening method respectively.By measuring moisture,pH and color difference,we compared the peeling effect and the impact on paper performance of the two methods.The results show that both methods can uncover stuck paper effectively.The steamingmoistening method can ameliorate the embrittlement problem of paper and it is superior in paper decontamination.Thus steaming-moistening method is suitable for uncovering heavily contaminated files.However,freezingsmocking method's decontamination performance is not as good as the steaming-moistening,while it has little impact on the paper color changes and is easy to operate.Significantly,both methods will increase the acidity of paper.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222