中国非传统安全研究的知识图谱分析——基于CiteSpace的可视化方法  

A Knowledge Mapping Analysis of Research Discourse in the Studies on China’s Non-traditional Security: A Visualization Approach Based on CiteSpace

作　　者：陈玉梅 付欢[4] Chen Yumei;Fu Huan(School of Public Administration/School of Emergency Management,Jinan University,Guangzhou 510632,China;Emergency Management Research Center,Jinan University,Guangzhou 510630,China;Center for Government Big Data Open&Social Innovation and Entrepreneurship(OGDSE),Jinan University,Guangzhou 510632,China;Shenzhen Insurance Association,Shenzhen 518046,China)

机构地区：[1]暨南大学公共管理学院/应急管理学院,广东广州510632 [2]暨南大学应急管理研究中心,广东广州510632 [3]暨南大学政务大数据开放与社会创新创业研究中心,广东广州510632 [4]深圳市保险同业公会,广东深圳518046

出　　处：《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2021年第3期29-47,共19页Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目(19BZZ070)。

摘　　要：非传统安全是我国近20年来重点关注的安全领域。对以中国非传统安全及相关主题为关键词的4 003篇中英文文献进行计量分析发现:从研究机构看,国内致力于非传统安全研究的机构主要有浙江大学、复旦大学、国际关系学院等,但还未形成全国范围内的开放、合作格局;从作者分布看,国内不同学科之间缺乏交互性,不同机构的研究人员之间也缺乏合作,而国外研究者的网络密度相对于国内学者要高;从关键词共现、聚类分析与突现词分析图谱来看,国外研究主要着眼于非传统安全研究的细分领域,中国的非传统安全研究在发展和演变过程中形成了四条演进路径,即高阶政治安全研究(1999—2004年)、低阶政治安全研究(2005—2009年)、软性安全研究(2010—2014年)、安全范式以及安全场域研究(2015年至今)。Under the globalization background, there have emerged many insecure factors of various forms directly threatening all countries and human beings. Therefore, non-traditional security research and non-traditional security crisis response have become the top priority of academic planning and decision-making in countries around the world. Through a comprehensive comparison and analysis of the evolution of "research discourse" in the domestic and foreign literature on China’s non-traditional security research in the past 20 years, research hotspots and trends can be intuitively extracted, thus enabling better understanding and guidance in the construction and development of the theoretical research framework of China’s non-traditional security. In this study, China’s non-traditional security and related topics were used as keywords to search in the Chinese full-text journal database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), from which 3, 064 Chinese documents of the past 20 years were retrieved. Meanwhile, the retrieval formula "SU=security study+China+Chinese" was used to search in the English literature database Web of Science, and 939 English journals were obtained. After a total of 4,003 documents were imported into the document analysis software CiteSpace, macro-and micro-quantitative researches on the interdisciplinary scope, research hotspots, discourse evolution and development trends of China’s non-traditional security were conducted in multiple dimensions such as the distribution of disciplines, research institutions and authors’ cooperation networks,keywords co-occurrences and clustering clusters, and burst terms from the research fronts. A comprehensive comparison with international non-traditional security research theories was also done at the same time.In the past 20 years, China’s non-traditional security research has shown an obvious growth trend in quantity. It reached its climax in 2014, after China put forward the "overall national security outlook".Domestic research is more comp

关 键 词：非传统安全研究 CITESPACE 知识图谱分析 可视化路径 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学] D815.5[政治法律—国际关系] D631[政治法律—政治学]