中国体育仲裁制度建构路径探析  

An analysis on the construction paths of Chinese sports arbitration system

作　　者：刘建进 莫然[2] LIU Jian-jin;MO Ran(Guangzhou College of Commerce,Guangzhou 511363,China;Guangdong University of Finance,Guangzhou 510520,China)

机构地区：[1]广州商学院,广东广州511363 [2]广东金融学院,广东广州510520

出　　处：《体育学刊》2021年第4期41-46,共6页Journal of Physical Education

摘　　要：我国体育仲裁制度的长期缺位阻碍着我国体育纠纷的有效解决,不利于我国体育事业的长远发展,考虑到我国体育纠纷的特殊性及纠纷解决的实际需求,构建我国体育仲裁制度刻不容缓。结合孙杨、大连超越等近年来典型案例,揭示体育仲裁制度缺位导致的现实困境,剖析阻碍我国体育仲裁制度建立的原因,进而提出我国体育仲裁制度建构的具体路径:第一,完善相关立法并确立体育仲裁制度;第二,建立独立的唯一体育仲裁机构;第三,依托国际力量搭建中国体育仲裁庭;第四,区域联合试点推动区域内体育组织探索同一仲裁机制。The long-term absence of China’s sports arbitration system hinders the effective settlement of China’s sports disputes,which is not conducive to the long-term development of China’s sports undertakings.Considering the particularity of China’s sports disputes and the actual needs of dispute resolution,the construction of China’s sports arbitration system can provide more practical and feasible intelligent solutions for China’s sports disputes.In accordance with recent typical events such as the Sun Yang case and Dalian ChaoYue case,this article reveals the real dilemma caused by the absence of sports arbitration,analyzes the reasons that hinder the establishment of sports arbitration in our country,and then propose the specific construction paths of Chinese sports arbitration system as follows:at first,improving relevant legislation and establishing spots arbitration system;secondly,building up independent and sole sports arbitration administration;thirdly,relying on the international forces to construct Chinese sports arbitration tribunal;fourthly,regional uniting trials propelling sports organizations of this region to actively explore the same arbitration system.

关 键 词：体育法 体育仲裁制度 体育纠纷 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]