临床教育路径与系统化健康教育在脊柱骨折术后康复护理中的对比研究  

A Comparative Study of Clinical Education Path and Systematic Health Education in Rehabilitation Nursing of Spinal Fracture Patients after Operation

作　　者：王海珠[1] 谭显春[1] 谢宇平 惠培林 李森[1] WANG Hai-zhu;TAN Xian-chun;XIE Yu-ping;HUI Pei-lin;LI Sen(Department of Orthopaedics,Dazhou Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine,Dazhou Sichuan 635000,China)

机构地区：[1]达州市中西医结合医院骨科,四川达州635000

出　　处：《医学食疗与健康》2021年第15期6-6,10,共2页Medical Diet and Health

摘　　要：目的:研究在脊柱骨折术后康复护理期间分别给予患者临床教育路径以及系统化健康教育的效果。方法:选取185例脊柱骨折患者为研究对象,给予康复护理。按随机数字表达法将185例患者分为A组(n=91),临床教育路径c与B组(n=94,系统化健康教育)。护理前后,对比两组肿胀变化、疼痛变化、并发症发生率以及患者满意度。结果:护理2周后,A组的肿胀与疼痛评分均低于B组,A组并发症发生率低于B组,A组患者满意度高于B组,两组差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:相较于系统化健康教育,在脊柱骨折术后康复护理期间选用临床教育路径效果更好,能缓解患者疼痛、肿胀,且更安全。Objective:To study the effect of clinical education path and systematic health education during the rehabilitation nursing of patients with spinal fracture.Methods:Select 185 cases of spinal fracture patients as the research object,give rehabilitation nursing.Methods:185 patients were randomly divided into group A(n=91),clinical education pathway group C and group B(n=94,systematic health education).Before and after nursing,the changes of swelling,pain,incidence of complications and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Results:After 2 weeks of nursing,the score of swelling and pain in group A was lower than that in group B,the incidence of complications in group A was lower than that in group B,and the satisfaction degree of patients in group A was higher than that in group B,the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with the systematic health education,the clinical education path in the rehabilitation nursing after spinal fracture surgery has better effect,can relieve the pain and swelling of patients,a nd is safer.

关 键 词：临床教育路径 系统化健康教育 脊柱骨折 康复护理 

分 类 号：R473.6[医药卫生—护理学]