马克思主义理论实践的科学路径——以《资本论》及其手稿研究为基础  

The Scientific Path of Marxist Theoretical Practice:Based on the Study of Das Kapital and its Manuscripts

作　　者：唐瑭[1] TANG Tang(Department of Philosophy,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,Fujian)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学哲学系,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2021年第4期9-18,共10页Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部社会科学青年基金项目“政治哲学视野下的《资本论》及其手稿研究”(17YJC720024)。

摘　　要：对于马克思主义经典著作《资本论》,以康德哲学为基础的政治哲学解读者将其视为一部对资本主义进行外在道德批判的著作,以斯密-黑格尔劳动观为基础的理论参与派试图将政治经济学批判与个人实践相结合。他们的论证焦点在于如何理解马克思主义理论实践。马克思主义理论实践既不是价值批判,也不是社会批判。马克思主义理论实践的规范基础不是自我决定的,它的现实基础也不是永恒不变的。从历史发生学的角度,通过对非历史性的物化意识的批判,马克思主义理论实践将历史认识与历史实践统一起来。澄清马克思主义理论实践的科学路径,有助于进一步推动当代中国的马克思主义理论实践。As for the Marxist classic Das Kapital,the interpreter of political philosophy based on Kantian philosophy regards it as a work of external moral criticism of capitalism,while the participators of theory based on the labor view of Smith and Hegel try to combine the criticism of political economy with personal practice.Their argumentation focuses on how to understand the Marxist theoretical practice.Marxist theoretical practice is neither value criticism nor social criticism.The normative basis of Marxist theoretical practice is not self-determined,nor is its realistic basis eternal.From the perspective of historical genesis,Marxist theoretical practice unites historical epistemology with historical practice by criticizing non-historical materialization consciousness.Clarifying the scientific path of Marxist theoretical practice is helpful to further promote the theoretical practice of Marxism in contemporary China.

关 键 词：马克思主义理论实践 《资本论》 历史内在矛盾 历史发生学 

分 类 号：B0-0[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]